Re: [SAtalk] For field, not To Field

2002-06-27 Thread Olivier Nicole
Hi, > I'm getting allot of problems with > SA marking mail as spam that's being sent to a group/list, even when the > recipient has been whitelisted. When sending to a group/list, who is THE recipient? If I am not wrong, a message send to a list of recipients on a single destination machine, is

Re: [SAtalk] For field, not To

2002-06-27 Thread Vivek Khera
> "BO" == Bill Omer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: BO> been whitelisted, but the To: field contains the group address, not the BO> actual recipient (which is in the 'for' field)). BO> Example: BO> by www (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g5QLv1gJ027650 BO> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 26

RE: [SAtalk] For field, not To

2002-06-27 Thread Bill Omer
> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 8:31 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] For field, not To > > > Is there a way to make SA base it's rules on the For field rather than the > To field if it exists? I'm having lots of problems with SA > marking mail as

[SAtalk] For field, not To

2002-06-27 Thread Bill Omer
Is there a way to make SA base it's rules on the For field rather than the To field if it exists? I'm having lots of problems with SA marking mail as spam that's being sent to a group or a list, even if the recipient has been whitelisted (it's looking for the To: field for the address to check if

[SAtalk] For field, not To Field

2002-06-27 Thread Bill Omer
I'm running SA/spamass-milter on a mail gateway, which forwards all mail (via esmtp) to an other mail server. I'm getting allot of problems with SA marking mail as spam that's being sent to a group/list, even when the recipient has been whitelisted. My question is, how can I make SA (preferably