Re: [SAtalk] European Girls spam consistently scores 0.0

2002-04-10 Thread Craig R Hughes
Bart Schaefer wrote: BS> I received a copy of the "Single European Girls" message at work, where BS> I'm using a different spam filter, which caught it giving this reasoning: BS> BS> X-Reject: Forged From: header slandering juno.com BS> X-Warning: From:/Message-Id: is local, but message is exter

Re: [SAtalk] European Girls spam consistently scores 0.0

2002-04-10 Thread Bart Schaefer
I received a copy of the "Single European Girls" message at work, where I'm using a different spam filter, which caught it giving this reasoning: X-Reject: Forged From: header slandering juno.com X-Warning: From:/Message-Id: is local, but message is external The procmail recipe for "slandering j

Re: [SAtalk] European Girls spam consistently scores 0.0

2002-04-09 Thread Nick Rothwell
> Odd, this same spam scores 4.8 on my machine. Hmm, I just got another one, headers as follows. As you can see, I'm on SA 2.11. X-Coding-System: iso-8859-1-unix Mail-from: From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 09 14:22:01 2002 Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTE

Re: [SAtalk] European Girls spam consistently scores 0.0

2002-04-08 Thread Rob McMillin
Craig R Hughes wrote: >Daniel Rogers wrote: > >>On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 09:15:24AM -, Nick Rothwell wrote: >> >>>...and I've had half a dozen copies now... >>> >>Odd, this same spam scores 4.8 on my machine. Also, this could be tickling >>the bug described in bugzilla bug #180, which is now

Re: [SAtalk] European Girls spam consistently scores 0.0

2002-04-08 Thread Craig R Hughes
Daniel Rogers wrote: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 09:15:24AM -, Nick Rothwell wrote: > > ...and I've had half a dozen copies now... > > Odd, this same spam scores 4.8 on my machine. Also, this could be tickling > the bug described in bugzilla bug #180, which is now fixed in CVS. If I were a b

Re: [SAtalk] European Girls spam consistently scores 0.0

2002-04-08 Thread Daniel Rogers
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 09:15:24AM -, Nick Rothwell wrote: > ...and I've had half a dozen copies now... Odd, this same spam scores 4.8 on my machine. Also, this could be tickling the bug described in bugzilla bug #180, which is now fixed in CVS. Dan. ___

Re: [SAtalk] European Girls spam consistently scores 0.0

2002-04-08 Thread Rob McMillin
Nick Rothwell wrote: >...and I've had half a dozen copies now... > Yes, that's always a risk when they don't say much. I got that spam, too, and noticed that they have a random string at the bottom to evade signature tests like Vipul's Razor. We subscribe to some commercial anti-spam services,

[SAtalk] European Girls spam consistently scores 0.0

2002-04-08 Thread Nick Rothwell
...and I've had half a dozen copies now... --- Start of forwarded message --- X-Coding-System: iso-8859-1-unix Mail-from: From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 08 00:02:24 2002 Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 5635 invoked from network); 8 Apr 200