Re: [SAtalk] Envelope from

2002-02-15 Thread Craig Hughes
I'd say that's probably the best way to do it -- given that all MTAs act differently, I'd say it's best left to the individual sysadmin to discover how (s)he might pass the envelope info, and then add their own rules to SA. C On Fri, 2002-02-15 at 08:56, dman wrote: > On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 02:

Re: [SAtalk] Envelope from

2002-02-15 Thread dman
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 02:52:05PM +, Nigel Metheringham wrote: | On Fri, 2002-02-15 at 14:45, dman wrote: | > On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 10:37:46AM +, Nigel Metheringham wrote: | > | In terms of headers, Return-Path: would be the one to go for. | > | > Well, in your message that I'm replyin

Re: [SAtalk] Envelope from

2002-02-15 Thread Nigel Metheringham
On Fri, 2002-02-15 at 14:45, dman wrote: > On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 10:37:46AM +, Nigel Metheringham wrote: > | In terms of headers, Return-Path: would be the one to go for. > > Well, in your message that I'm replying to, there is no Return-Path: > header. Maybe procmail sticks that in or som

Re: [SAtalk] Envelope from

2002-02-15 Thread dman
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 10:37:46AM +, Nigel Metheringham wrote: | On Thu, 2002-02-14 at 22:07, dman wrote: | > The easiest way is to make a command line option and then tell the | > admin to configure the MTA to pass the data on the command line. I | > know that it would be easy for exim to d

Re: [SAtalk] Envelope from

2002-02-15 Thread Nigel Metheringham
On Thu, 2002-02-14 at 22:07, dman wrote: > The easiest way is to make a command line option and then tell the > admin to configure the MTA to pass the data on the command line. I > know that it would be easy for exim to do that. The other easy method is to use SMTP or BSMTP injection - this woul

Re: [SAtalk] Envelope from

2002-02-14 Thread Mark
- Original Message - From: "rODbegbie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Spam Assassin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 3:37 AM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Envelope from > > Yes, a header w

Re: [SAtalk] Envelope from

2002-02-14 Thread rODbegbie
> Yes, a header will contain a line that says: > > X-eGroups-Return: ... > > But where do I add such rule? In head_test? I see some Perl regex in there, > but also several eval functions. Put it in your /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf. Something like: header YAHOOGROUPSX-eGroups-Return =~ /

Re: [SAtalk] Envelope from

2002-02-14 Thread dman
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 10:40:39AM +1300, Jason Haar wrote: | On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 03:49:02AM -0800, Craig Hughes wrote: | > There's been some reasonable amount of discussion about being able to | > pass envelope data into SA for processing. Nobody has done a whole lot | > about it though; I'm

Re: [SAtalk] Envelope from

2002-02-14 Thread Craig Hughes
On Thu, 2002-02-14 at 13:40, Jason Haar wrote: > On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 03:49:02AM -0800, Craig Hughes wrote: > > There's been some reasonable amount of discussion about being able to > > pass envelope data into SA for processing. Nobody has done a whole lot > > about it though; I'm willing to c

Re: [SAtalk] Envelope from

2002-02-14 Thread Jason Haar
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 03:49:02AM -0800, Craig Hughes wrote: > There's been some reasonable amount of discussion about being able to > pass envelope data into SA for processing. Nobody has done a whole lot > about it though; I'm willing to consider patches if someone wants to > contribute anythi

Re: [SAtalk] Envelope from

2002-02-14 Thread Donald Greer
Mark wrote: > Dear people, > > I have been trying to put mail from *groups.yahoo.com to the white_list. I > added an entry like this: > > whitelist_from *groups.yahoo.com > > But mail coming from those groups are still flagged as spam. Naturally > groups.yahoo.com is not in the sender From: a

Re: [SAtalk] Envelope from

2002-02-14 Thread Mark
- Original Message - From: "dman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 4:22 PM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Envelope from > On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 12:17:56PM +0100, Mark wrote: > > But mail coming from those groups are s

Re: [SAtalk] Envelope from

2002-02-14 Thread dman
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 12:17:56PM +0100, Mark wrote: | But mail coming from those groups are still flagged as spam. Naturally | groups.yahoo.com is not in the sender From: address, but in the envelope | from. Is there a way I can test for that too, so as to put it on the | whitelist? Does yaho

Re: [SAtalk] Envelope from

2002-02-14 Thread Craig Hughes
There's been some reasonable amount of discussion about being able to pass envelope data into SA for processing. Nobody has done a whole lot about it though; I'm willing to consider patches if someone wants to contribute anything helpful here. C On Thu, 2002-02-14 at 03:17, Mark wrote: > Dear p

[SAtalk] Envelope from

2002-02-14 Thread Mark
Dear people, I have been trying to put mail from *groups.yahoo.com to the white_list. I added an entry like this: whitelist_from *groups.yahoo.com But mail coming from those groups are still flagged as spam. Naturally groups.yahoo.com is not in the sender From: address, but in the envelope fro