> -Original Message-
> From: Craig Hughes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 24 February 2002 23:24
> To: Richie Laager; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] CVS Notification -- Potential False Positive
>
>
> I kind of hesitate on this one -- but it
I kind of hesitate on this one -- but it's a rule that will match pretty
fast, so I think I'll probably add it in. It does seem unlikely that a CVS
notification body would add another 2.5 points of spamminess.
C
On 2/24/02 2:47 PM, "Richie Laager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The following rules reverse the effect of SUPERLONG_LINE and
FROM_AND_TO_SAME, when a CVS notification comes through.
While a 2.5 is a relatively low score, this compensation allows for
other conditions in the notification that might set off SpamAssas
