> -----Original Message----- > From: Craig Hughes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 24 February 2002 23:24 > To: Richie Laager; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] CVS Notification -- Potential False Positive > > > I kind of hesitate on this one -- but it's a rule that will > match pretty > fast, so I think I'll probably add it in. It does seem > unlikely that a CVS > notification body would add another 2.5 points of spamminess. > The problem is also there isn't a standard way to say 'CVS Notification'. Another common one is 'CVS Update' (which is what we use here), but it can be anything that the site wants it to be.
Tony _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
