anks a lot.
Regards,
Somik
- Original Message -
From: "Donald L. Greer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Somik Raha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 1:25 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Blocking spam from High Speed Media (v
I just added this to my local config:
body RECEIVED_LOGIC_TO_PL /.*https?\:\/\/.*\/logic\/to\.pl\?.*/i
describe RECEIVED_LOGIC_TO_PL Received from spammer
body RECEIVED_LOGIC_OD_PL /.*https?\:\/\/.*\/logic\/od\.pl\?.*/i
describe RECEIVED_LOGIC_OD_PL Received from spammer
score
> Or just add
>
> sendfree.com REJECT
> hi-speedmail REJECT
>
> to /etc/mail/access
That didn't work . Though, Procmail filters set on the Reply-to field did
the job. These folks have a pattern in their reply-to message.
Regards,
Somik
---
Th
Or just add
sendfree.comREJECT
hi-speedmailREJECT
to /etc/mail/access
Peter
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 31/12/2002 at 3:06 PM Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 10:17:33AM -0800, Somik Raha wrote:
>> checks. I tried modifying it as suggested earlier by Th
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 10:17:33AM -0800, Somik Raha wrote:
> checks. I tried modifying it as suggested earlier by Theo and Mike, but the
> sendmail checks don't work at all (I think bcos sendmail does not handle
> regular expressions(?)).
sendmail accessdb doesn't do regexp. There is some RE cap
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 7:20 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Blocking spam from High Speed Media (v2.43)
> Somik Raha wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >I went thru some of the earlier messages titled "Increase in low
scoring
> >spam", but I wasn'
Somik Raha wrote:
Hi,
I went thru some of the earlier messages titled "Increase in low scoring
spam", but I wasn't able to figure out what I could do in version 2.43 to
block mails from High Speed Media (I'm still new to SA).
Hamish Marson had posted these checks :
/^From: .*@sendfree\.com
Mike Burger wrote:
Definitely not postfix.
Postfix's entries would look like:
domain.com 550 Blocked due to spamming
Actually they are from postfix. But thanks anyway.
They are header checks using a regexp table.
H
On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 a
Definitely not postfix.
Postfix's entries would look like:
domain.com 550 Blocked due to spamming
On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 12:43:05AM -0500, Mike Burger wrote:
> > Those checks, in the syntax listed, would be added to an access list for
> > Sendmai
On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 12:43:05AM -0500, Mike Burger wrote:
> Those checks, in the syntax listed, would be added to an access list for
> Sendmail (/etc/mail/access, which would then need to be hashed into a
> database).
Well, those lines aren't valid for sendmail (access db doesn't do regex).
I
Those checks, in the syntax listed, would be added to an access list for
Sendmail (/etc/mail/access, which would then need to be hashed into a
database).
I can be of more service if you're running Postfix...can't help with qmail
or Exim, I'm afraid.
On Sun, 29 Dec 2002, Somik Raha wrote:
> Hi
Hi,
I went thru some of the earlier messages titled "Increase in low scoring
spam", but I wasn't able to figure out what I could do in version 2.43 to
block mails from High Speed Media (I'm still new to SA).
Hamish Marson had posted these checks :
/^From: .*@sendfree\.com/ REJECT Blo
12 matches
Mail list logo
