On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 09:10:36PM +0300, Harri Pesonen wrote:
> This has probably been asked a zillion times, but why so low scores?
Pretty much, yes.
http://spamassassin.taint.org/faq/index.cgi?req=show&file=faq01.005.htp
> I have noticed that SA has missed a couple of mails, score about 4.8,
This has probably been asked a zillion times, but
why so low scores?
# score BAYES_00 0 0 -5.300 -5.200# score
BAYES_01 0 0 -5.400 -5.400# score BAYES_10 0 0 -5.300 -4.701# score
BAYES_20 0 0 -4.701 -2.601# score BAYES_30 0 0 -1.070 -0.927# score
BAYES_40 0.0# score BAYES_44 0.0# score BAY
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 09:10:36PM +0300, Harri Pesonen wrote:
>
>This has probably been asked a zillion times, but why so low scores?
I think that it's just to pick safe defaults. Bayes is only reliable
after it's been well-trained.
>Because there are spam filters, that rely on Bayes
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Daniel Carrera yowled:
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 09:10:36PM +0300, Harri Pesonen wrote:
>>
>>This has probably been asked a zillion times, but why so low scores?
>
> I think that it's just to pick safe defaults. Bayes is only reliable
> after it's been well-trained.
The
