On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 09:10:36PM +0300, Harri Pesonen wrote: > > This has probably been asked a zillion times, but why so low scores?
I think that it's just to pick safe defaults. Bayes is only reliable after it's been well-trained. > Because there are spam filters, that rely on Bayes only, why not trust > it more and give BAYES_90 and BAYES_99 bigger scores: > > score BAYES_90 0 0 4.027 4.0 > score BAYES_99 0 0 5.200 4.2 I did. > I have noticed that SA has missed a couple of mails, score about 4.8, > even though Bayes gave them 90% or 99% probability. I noticed that too. After I found that my SA was well-trained enough to have a very high accuracy I raised the values for BAYES. Cheers, -- Daniel Carrera | PGP: 6643 8C8B 3522 66CB D16C D779 2FDD 7DAC 9AF7 7A88 Math PhD. UMD | http://www.math.umd.edu/~dcarrera/pgp.html Weekly Smile: There are 10 types of people in the world... Those who understand binary - and those who don't. - http://bash.org ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
