Re: [SAtalk] Bayes safety zone

2003-06-05 Thread Simon Byrnand
At 10:30 1/06/03 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote: On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 08:34:52AM -0500, Tom Meunier wrote: > I don't understand the Bayes safety zone, where it's set, and why it's hard coded. > there. Looked in MAN SA-LEARN but didn't find anything. Anyone feel to make sure people don't shoot

RE: [SAtalk] Bayes safety zone

2003-06-02 Thread Gary Funck
> -Original Message- > From: Mike Leone > Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 8:25 AM > > So bayes wouldn't learn this was spam, unless the score was 19? I > rarely get > spam with scores higher than that. Am I misunderstanding? > In my recent spam mailbox, with about 2500 messages (over the pas

Re: [SAtalk] Bayes safety zone

2003-06-02 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 11:24:38AM -0400, Mike Leone wrote: > So bayes wouldn't learn this was spam, unless the score was 19? I rarely get > spam with scores higher than that. Am I misunderstanding? yes you are. You need both a score of at least 15 (configurable spam learning value) and a score

Re: [SAtalk] Bayes safety zone

2003-06-02 Thread Mike Leone
Theo Van Dinter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) had this to say on 06/01/03 at 11:14: > On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 08:34:52AM -0500, Tom Meunier wrote: > > I don't understand the Bayes safety zone, where it's set, and why it's > > hard coded. > > > there. Looked in MAN SA-LEARN but didn't find anything. Anyo

RE: [SAtalk] Bayes safety zone

2003-06-02 Thread Tom Meunier
Thanks, Theo. I figured as much, just couldn't find if it was a setting somewhere. > in this case, -1.975 should be outside the safety zone, but > it's > than the -2 required for learning as ham. > Yup, I wasn't using those scores as part of the example, just wanted to reference the keywords.

Re: [SAtalk] Bayes safety zone

2003-06-02 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 08:34:52AM -0500, Tom Meunier wrote: > I don't understand the Bayes safety zone, where it's set, and why it's hard coded. > there. Looked in MAN SA-LEARN but didn't find anything. Anyone feel to make sure people don't shoot themselves in the foot. we removed it in 2.60

[SAtalk] Bayes safety zone

2003-06-02 Thread Tom Meunier
I don't understand the Bayes safety zone, where it's set, and why it's there. Looked in MAN SA-LEARN but didn't find anything. Anyone feel like pointing me in the right direction? spamd -D snippage follows. -tom - debug: running meta tests; score so far=-1.3 debug: auto-learn? safety=4