Thanks, Theo. I figured as much, just couldn't find if it was a setting somewhere. > in this case, -1.975 should be outside the safety zone, but > it's > than the -2 required for learning as ham. >
Yup, I wasn't using those scores as part of the example, just wanted to reference the keywords. Thanks again. -tom > > -----Original Message----- > From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 9:30 AM > To: Tom Meunier > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 08:34:52AM -0500, Tom Meunier wrote: > > I don't understand the Bayes safety zone, where it's set, > and why it's > > hard coded. > > > there. Looked in MAN SA-LEARN but didn't find anything. > Anyone feel > > to make sure people don't shoot themselves in the foot. we > removed it in 2.60 in the true UNIX fashion. > > > debug: auto-learn? safety=4, ham=-2, spam=15, body-hits=-0.4, > > basically safety means that the score has to be more than 4 > points outside of the required_hits setting. > > > debug: auto-learn: original score: -1.3, recomputed score: -1.975 > > debug: auto-learn? no: inside auto-learn thresholds or safety zone > > around required_hits > > in this case, -1.975 should be outside the safety zone, but > it's > than the -2 required for learning as ham. > > -- > Randomly Generated Tagline: > And 1.1.81 is officially BugFree(tm), so if you receive any > bug-reports on it, you know they are just evil lies." > (By Linus Torvalds, [EMAIL PROTECTED]) > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for less on eBay! http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
