On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 09:09:32AM -0500, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> i am getting the following bayes error when trying to do a
> force-expire. Is there any way around this so i can expire my old
> tokens?
>
> debug: bayes: expiry check keep size, 75% of max: 75
> debug: bayes: token count: 0,
Hello,
i am getting the following bayes error when trying to do a
force-expire. Is there any way around this so i can expire my old
tokens?
debug: bayes: found bayes db version 2
synced Bayes databases from journal in 0 seconds: 569 unique entries
(569 total entries)
debug: bayes: expiry chec
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 05:07:25PM -0800, Justin Mason wrote:
> I think the implementation of "each" in DB_File must be inefficient,
> creating an in-memory list. It might be a good idea to check out
> DB_File's built-in iterator methods, now that we only support that
> db module. Haven't check
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Theo Van Dinter writes:
>The expiry should, theoretically, not take a lot of memory since it
>really only needs to have 1 token in memory at a time while it copies
>between database files. An expiry forces a journal sync though, so an
>expiry run wil
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 04:11:48PM -0600, Smart,Dan wrote:
> So if I set the Journal to a really big number, like 10MB, then the
> once-per-day opportunistic sync rule should kick in and sync once per day.
>
> So a sync takes as much or more memory than an expiration run?
Yeah, fun question: The
So if I set the Journal to a really big number, like 10MB, then the
once-per-day opportunistic sync rule should kick in and sync once per day.
So a sync takes as much or more memory than an expiration run?
<>
| -Original Message-
| From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 01:47:55PM -0600, Smart,Dan wrote:
> Is there a reason that the journal needs to be synced more than once per
> day? Why is the default set to 100KB?
The default was reasonable for most users. There's no need, really,
to sync more than once a day, but a large journal mean
ct: Re: [SAtalk] Bayes Expiry limits and Journal size
|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) writes:
|
| > Smart,Dan writes:
| >> I'm running Bayes site wide with about 45,000 messages per
| day. Is
| >> there any harm in increasing the bayes_expiry_max_db_size and
| >&g
Yevgeniy Miretskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> sa-learn stopped learning messages. Debugging shows that it can
> successfully tie Bayes db, extracts tokens, etc, but never actually
> writes data to the database.
>
> No matter what bayes_expiry_max_db_size is set to (I tried anything from 100K t
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Yevgeniy Miretskiy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> sa-learn stopped learning messages. Debugging shows that it can
> successfully tie Bayes db, extracts tokens, etc, but never actually
> writes data to the database.
>
> I had a db corruption issue some time ago, so, this could very
> wel
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 02:45:17PM -0500, Yevgeniy Miretskiy wrote:
> No matter what bayes_expiry_max_db_size is set to (I tried anything from 100K to
> 3Mil),
> sa-learn reports, after running for quite some time:
> bayes: couldn't find a good delta atime, need more token difference, skipping
Hello,
sa-learn stopped learning messages. Debugging shows that it can
successfully tie Bayes db, extracts tokens, etc, but never actually
writes data to the database.
I had a db corruption issue some time ago, so, this could very
well be remnants of that.
Anyway, I'm trying to run "sa-learn -
I'm working on just that.
My thought, and I must admit I don't know all the theory involved, is that
the effectiveness of Bayes and the FN/FP is purely a function of how you
trained it. The *ONLY* way (in my mind) to score the Bayes functions would
be to train it and run the Mass-check. I'm work
Hi,
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Smart,Dan wrote:
> Is there a reason that the Bayes scoring is NOT a normal distribution from
> 50% to 100%, and negative from 0% to 50%?
Yes, check the [SAtalk] list archives; this may well be a FAQ.
Short answer: all scores including those from Bayes are generated by a
0 3.0
score BAYES_98 4.0
score BAYES_99 5.4
-
Comments?
<>
| -Original Message-
| From: Ted Cabeen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 6:22 PM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Cc: Smart,Dan; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subj
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) writes:
> Smart,Dan writes:
>> I'm running Bayes site wide with about 45,000 messages per day. Is there
>> any harm in increasing the bayes_expiry_max_db_size and
>> bayes_journal_max_size limits?
>>
>> If it's ok to make bigger, what is the maximum before somet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Smart,Dan writes:
> I'm running Bayes site wide with about 45,000 messages per day. Is there
> any harm in increasing the bayes_expiry_max_db_size and
> bayes_journal_max_size limits?
>
> If it's ok to make bigger, what is the maximum before someth
Title: Blank Stationery
I'm running Bayes site wide with about
45,000 messages per day. Is there any harm in increasing the
bayes_expiry_max_db_size and bayes_journal_max_size limits?
If it's ok to make bigger, what is the
maximum before something bad starts happening?
<>
18 matches
Mail list logo
