RE: [SAtalk] Bayes spam-ham or ham-spam ratios

2003-10-30 Thread Larry Gilson
k them unless you find you have a problem. > > Remember: If it's not broken, don't fix it. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Larry Gilson > Sent: 28 October 2003 20:20 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] Bayes spam-ham or ham-spam ratios > > > I am

RE: [SAtalk] Bayes spam-ham or ham-spam ratios

2003-10-30 Thread Giles Coochey
TECTED] Sent: 28 October 2003 20:20 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] Bayes spam-ham or ham-spam ratios I am using 2.55. If the answer is different for 2.60, please answer with respect to 2.60 as I will be upgrading *very* soon. I am experimenting with Bayes in a site-wide/gateway configu

[SAtalk] Bayes spam-ham or ham-spam ratios

2003-10-28 Thread Larry Gilson
I am using 2.55. If the answer is different for 2.60, please answer with respect to 2.60 as I will be upgrading *very* soon. I am experimenting with Bayes in a site-wide/gateway configuration. One thing that I believe is affecting my tests is the external Procmail whitelist. I find the number o