Re: [SAtalk] Am I nuts or should this have been flagged differently

2003-07-27 Thread Matthew Cline
On Friday 25 July 2003 11:52 am, Jeff Funk wrote: > Here's a header of an e-mail I just received. The F'word has been replaced > with X's. Isn't there a default rule in SA somewhere that would catch > that? Seems like a pretty obvious nasty to me . . . . No, such a word is commonly used in non-

[SAtalk] Am I nuts or should this have been flagged differently

2003-07-27 Thread Jeff Funk
Here's a header of an e-mail I just received. The F'word has been replaced with X's. Isn't there a default rule in SA somewhere that would catch that? Seems like a pretty obvious nasty to me . . . . Subject: Naked victims being XX X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=6.6 tests=DAT