On Sun, 7 Dec 2003, Richard Bewley wrote:
> Hmm, it looks as though this would be the problem:
>
> debug: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? no
> debug: is DNS available? 0
Yup. If you're trying to run a DNS-based RBL, that'll
stop you in your tracks.
> Now, the next question, how do I go
At 08:49 PM 12/7/03 -0500, Richard Bewley wrote:
mm, it looks as though this would be the problem:
debug: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? no
debug: is DNS available? 0
Now, the next question, how do I go about installing Net::DNS, do I have to
use CPAN?
you can do it via tarball, and most distros
;; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'El
Mariposa'
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Adding another RBL
Hmm, it looks as though this would be the problem:
debug: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? no
debug: is DNS available? 0
Now, the next question, how do I go about installing Net::DNS, do I have to
use CPAN?
Tha
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David B Funk
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 1:35 AM
To: Richard Bewley
Cc: 'Matt Kettler'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Adding another RBL
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Richard Bewley wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Now, I have the following:
>
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Matt Kettler wrote:
> header RCVD_IN_MY_BNBLeval:check_rbl ('blue','bl.blueshore.net.')
> describe RCVD_IN_MY_BNBL Listed by bl.blueshore.net
> tflags RCVD_IN_MY_BNBLnet
> score RCVD_IN_MY_BNBL 5.0
>
> Technicaly I don't think the tf
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Richard Bewley wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Now, I have the following:
> header RCVD_IN_MY_BNBLeval:check_rbl('bl', 'bl.blueshore.net.',
> '2')
> describe RCVD_IN_MY_BNBL Listed by bl.blueshore.net
> tflags RCVD_IN_MY_BNBLnet
> score RCVD_IN_MY_BNBL
M
To: Richard Bewley; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Adding another RBL
At 12:30 AM 12/4/03 -0500, Richard Bewley wrote:
>So, do I still need the 'bl', 'bl.blueshore.net'.'? Or, can I just leave
>that out?
Well, you DEFINITELY need the bl.blueshore.net.. o
really not sure the cause...
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Richard
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Kettler
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 1:01 AM
To: Richard Bewley; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Adding another RBL
At 12:30 A
At 12:30 AM 12/4/03 -0500, Richard Bewley wrote:
So, do I still need the 'bl', 'bl.blueshore.net'.'? Or, can I just leave
that out?
Well, you DEFINITELY need the bl.blueshore.net.. otherwise how would SA
know what blacklist to query?
The 'bl' part can be more-or-less any unique string. It's used
doesn't work. I also tried it without the '2', any more ideas?
Thanks,
Richard
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Kettler
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:47 PM
To: Richard Bewley; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk]
Hi,
So, do I still need the 'bl', 'bl.blueshore.net'.'? Or, can I just leave
that out?
Thanks,
Richard
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:47 PM
To: Richard Bewley; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re
At 09:13 PM 12/3/03 -0500, Richard Bewley wrote:
header RCVD_IN_MY_BNBLeval:check_rbl_txt('bl',
'bl.blueshore.net.')
describe RCVD_IN_MY_BNBL Listed by bl.blueshore.net
tflags RCVD_IN_MY_BNBLnet
score RCVD_IN_MY_BNBL 5.0
From looking bl.blueshores.net, t
Hi,
I had this in my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf file:
header RCVD_IN_MY_BNBLeval:check_rbl_txt('bl',
'bl.blueshore.net.')
describe RCVD_IN_MY_BNBL Listed by bl.blueshore.net
tflags RCVD_IN_MY_BNBLnet
score RCVD_IN_MY_BNBL 5.0
For some reason, how
13 matches
Mail list logo
