- Original Message -
From: "Lucas Albers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 12:29 AM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Adding Perl 5.6.1 to RH Linux 9 that already has Perl
5.8 installed.
> Is it worthwhile to have SA complain loudly
> Joe -
>
> I've been running it on RH 9 since 2.53, and it has been rock solid. I
> just
> made sure I unset the LANG environment variable before running the
> installation.
> --
Is it worthwhile to have SA complain loudly if the defined langage is utf?
Should it refuse to run?
Complain on the c
h.com
- Original Message -
From: "Joe Flowers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 6:38 PM
Subject: [SAtalk] Adding Perl 5.6.1 to RH Linux 9 that already has Perl 5.8
installed.
> I ha
> I have a Red Hat Linux 9 machine that has Perl 5.8 installed on it, and
Perl
> 5.8 on this machine looks deeply embedded to the core of the OS, based on
> the ton of dependencies when I do "rpm -e perl". I need to run
SpamAssassin
> on this machine, but the SpamAssassin docs highly recommends
At 19:38 10/07/03 -0400, Joe Flowers wrote:
I have a Red Hat Linux 9 machine that has Perl 5.8 installed on it, and Perl
5.8 on this machine looks deeply embedded to the core of the OS, based on
the ton of dependencies when I do "rpm -e perl". I need to run SpamAssassin
on this machine, but the Spa
I have a Red Hat Linux 9 machine that has Perl 5.8 installed on it, and Perl
5.8 on this machine looks deeply embedded to the core of the OS, based on
the ton of dependencies when I do "rpm -e perl". I need to run SpamAssassin
on this machine, but the SpamAssassin docs highly recommends using Perl
