Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 and Dynamic IP Checks

2003-09-23 Thread Daniel Quinlan
Ryan Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Doh, I remember looking in the perldoc and thinking "ok it isn't in the > deprecated section", obviously I was wrong since it actually is. Is > there another config option that would perform the same behavior or has > that functionality been lost in 2.60

Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 and Dynamic IP Checks

2003-09-23 Thread Ryan Moore
Doh, I remember looking in the perldoc and thinking "ok it isn't in the deprecated section", obviously I was wrong since it actually is. Is there another config option that would perform the same behavior or has that functionality been lost in 2.60? Ryan Moore -- Perigee.net Corporation

Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 and Dynamic IP Checks

2003-09-23 Thread Daniel Quinlan
Ryan Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > By default SA will check the 9 previous hosts listed in the RECEIVED > headers. You could lower that by using "num_check_received" directive in > your usr_prefs/local.cf, I currently use a setting of four. "num_check_received" is a deprecated setting in

Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 and Dynamic IP Checks

2003-09-23 Thread Ryan Moore
By default SA will check the 9 previous hosts listed in the RECEIVED headers. You could lower that by using "num_check_received" directive in your usr_prefs/local.cf, I currently use a setting of four. Ryan Moore -- Perigee.net Corporation 704-849-8355 (sales) 704-849-8017 (tech) www.per

[SAtalk] 2.60 and Dynamic IP Checks

2003-09-23 Thread David L. Crow
First, thanks so much for Spamassassin. It works so well! I received an email with the following Received headers: Received: from ms-smtp-02.texas.rr.com (ms-smtp-02.texas.rr.com [24.93.36.230]) by waterloo.OrangeBlood.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h8NDa2UW031261 for <[EMAIL