Re: [SAtalk] 2.01 released

2002-01-25 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
> Also, I haven't applied Andrew K's patch for spamc to handle EXT and HOST; > I'd prefer to do that in the 2.1 devel tree. Sounds good to me, I've only really been able to cursory test the code anyway. It seems to work well, even when you specify environment variables which don't exist (i.e.

Re: [SAtalk] 2.01 released

2002-01-24 Thread Justin Mason
Scott Griffith, ISES-LLC said: > Thanks again to all the contributors for what is turning out to be a > very well-founded open development effort. Cheers! Now let's hope there's no more show-stoppers in 2.01 ;) --j. ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing li

Re: [SAtalk] 2.01 released

2002-01-24 Thread Scott Griffith, ISES-LLC
On Jan 25, Justin Mason wrote: > Here's 2.01, a bugfix release for 2.0, since whitelist_to etc. were > not working. > > http://SpamAssassin.org/downloads.html An outstanding effort: thanks very much, speaking only for myself as a overly-paranoid mailserver owner. I do think that this i

[SAtalk] 2.01 released

2002-01-24 Thread Justin Mason
OK, compromise ;) Here's 2.01, a bugfix release for 2.0, since whitelist_to etc. were not working. http://SpamAssassin.org/downloads.html changes: - whitelist_to did not work with multiple To or CC addresses. fixed. - ^M's in headers are now ignored, for compatibility with MUAs an