"Ralf G. R. Bergs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This French spam just came across the XFS for Linux ML:
Looks like a forged Amazon message, not the fault of bondedsender.
More like we need to improve our Received: header handling (not an
easy problem, but I've been looking at it).
> [...]
> So
On Wed, 09 Oct 2002 21:39:27 +0200, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
[...]
>> On http://www.bondedsender.org/referred.html it says to report the
>> message. Of course I will not do that -- I fear that might have the
>> adverse effect of producing even more spam. :-(
>
>... and of course won't Bonded Sender
On Wednesday 09 October 2002 21:13 CET Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
> This French spam just came across the XFS for Linux ML:
> [...]
>
> So there!! :-(
So there what?
> I just set the score for RCVD_IN_BONDEDSENDER to 0.0.
>
> On http://www.bondedsender.org/referred.html it says to report the
> mess
mAssassin-Talk ML" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 2:13 PM
Subject: [SAtalk] "Bonded sender" joke :-/
> This French spam just came across the XFS for Linux ML:
>
> >Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
> > by oss.sgi.com (8.12.
This French spam just came across the XFS for Linux ML:
>Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
> by oss.sgi.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g99I5KtG005084;
> Wed, 9 Oct 2002 11:05:20 -0700
>Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-xfs); Wed, 09 Oct 2002 10:56:31 -
070
