whenever i see my email address in a spam url, i visit that url with
all the whois contact info for the domain in question.
On Friday, August 22, 2003, at 07:31 PM, Jonathan Nichols wrote:
ARGH
I want to SHOOT this spammer. Repeatedly. These ALWAYS pop in at 4.9,
always using "jnichols@(faked.co
as to routing them somewhere else...
does SA have a custom header even possible?
ie – if certain tests pass, throw in a SA: Virus_Bounce
cos the only way i can think of tossing them into another bucket would
be to run a series of regexs in a filter to toss them elsewhere
which amounts to doubl
Check here too:
http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/exim.php
On Tuesday, August 19, 2003, at 01:30 PM, Martin Bretschneider wrote:
"Christopher M. Iarocci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Christopher,
Anybody have Exim and SA running as a SPAM filtering/blocking gateway
that would want to share their co
Or Exim with Sa-Exim
exim.org
sa-exim.sf.net
On Tuesday, August 19, 2003, at 11:26 AM, Covington, Chris wrote:
Why don't you consider Postfix and Amavisd-new, since you're switching
to a new mailer anyway?
http://www.geocities.com/scottlhenderson/spamfilter.html
Chris
-Original Message---
is anyone else on this list getting bouncebacks from the above server
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) for 'sensitive content' or 'profanity'?
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and
i said _a friend_ did that. not myself.
believe it or not, i speak french -- and would rather be living there
than this piece of shit country
i do like the anti-french movement for one thing though -- i bought a
lot of wine on clearance for 60% off when there was the whole 'boycott
france'
a friend blocked all mail from france as a joke once, cos he didn't
like the french and didn't know anyone there
cut down on spam by 95%
not that i agree, but i'm just saying...
On Sunday, July 27, 2003, at 07:12 PM, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
Nix wrote:
however, blocking entire IP classes such as
yeah.. its really interesting -- because reading it, it reads like a
lot of emails i get
bayes didn't score it at all
On Friday, July 25, 2003, at 01:51 PM, Chris Santerre wrote:
OK that is much better to have the example. And this is kind of
perfect for
what I wanted to discuss about rule w
double traffic. eek. didn't think of that.
since it would be a sitewide application though, it could just run
nightly and report cumulative amounts.
the real thing that i want to accomplish, is alerting bandwidth
providers of the activity.
whether its an abusive customer or an insecure box
i dont know how useful this would be, but i was thinking of a spam
reporting tool that did the following:
sends a message to root/webmaster/whatever of the mailing ip
traceroutes the ip, and finds the location facility and/or isp -- then
mails root/webmaster and all whois contacts for that comp
if it were only so easy..
i think i might just give a couple points for "playing cards" in the
body. maybe that and 'support american soldiers'
the newest one reads :
Subject: Saddam's evil biological weapons -- his sons
Body: Big news yesterday. Saddam's two sons, Uday and Qusay
Huss
I've been getting dozens of these, and they've got pretty clever
senders who don't seem to be doing things that other rules or bayes
catch.
anyone have some good custom rules they use?
does 2.6 already have rules for this (or planned inclusion) ?
-
you can do exim compiled in with spamassassin. there's a patch that
does this called sa-exim
sa-exim.sf.net
exim.org
someone asked how to do this last week, and there were some posfix and
sendmail approaches as well
On Wednesday, July 23, 2003, at 09:29 AM, Christopher M. Iarocci wrote:
I h
My mta is set to reject all .pif's at smtp time.. i've just been
getting so damn many of 'em
On Tuesday, July 22, 2003, at 01:51 PM, Shane Williams wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
just wondering--
does anyone know what virus causes that one?
Sobig.c, and it seems like you'd
just wondering--
does anyone know what virus causes that one?
On Tuesday, July 22, 2003, at 01:05 PM, John McGivern wrote:
Hi everyone.
I would like to use SA to block this an email with this in the freom
field: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" I've tried creating a rule but I haven't been
successful bec
On Thursday, July 17, 2003, at 04:26 PM, Nix wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] muttered drunkenly:
but by doing sa-learn, one has the option to skip rebuilding the bayes
database after the scan -- which has significantly reduced my
execution time and resources used
spamassassin -r doe
if you want to do
scan for virus with clam av
scan with spamassassin
there's an excelllent how-to here for use with the exim mail server:
http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/exim.php
forwarding to an exchange server shouldn't be hard on any system
i just switched over to exim
On Wednesday, July 16, 2003, at 04:14 PM, Nix wrote:
You'd have to run the files through spamassassin -d before passing them
to razor, and sa-learn also has to do that, so spamassassin -r is
faster
(you're only doing the equivalent of a -d once) as well as being more
effective (you're reporting to
spamassassin -r reports to razor/pyzor and bayes
sa-learn only does bayes?
what would be best for reporting a maildir of spam?
spamassassin -r each file?
or sa-learn the directory and then report each file to razor?
i can imagine there's a speed tradeoff between sa-learn and
spamassassin -r .
19 matches
Mail list logo
