Re: [SAtalk] Why no `.bat .exe .com .pif' rule?

2002-04-23 Thread joost witteveen
> > I'm sure the goal of the message is to make me write a .bat > > file (the same message appears in .exe, .pif, ... variants), > > that I then later execute. > > > > So, I wonder, why didn't the message hit any spamassassin rule? > > Because it's a virus, not spam. There are several ways of int

[SAtalk] Why no `.bat .exe .com .pif' rule?

2002-04-23 Thread joost witteveen
Well, OK I'm sure there is a rule that catches files like .bat .pif .exe .com, but anyway, I'm getting a lot of messages like: > Received: from unknown (HELO inje.iskon.hr) ([213.191.128.16]) (envelope-sender ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) > [...] > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.6 tests=LARGE_HE