been generated with
'IO::Socket::UNIX->new()' , then ' ($pid, $uid, $gid) = unpack("LLL",
$client->sockopt(17));' should provide the necessary informations.
Anybody can tell if there is a chance? If you think this is a stupid
idea I like to get some reasons so
n't see a problem with "maintaining the bayes stuff" yet.
[...]
Thx and nice holidays,
Hans
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM
Hi Brad,
Brad Koehn schrieb :
>
> On Dec 30, 2003, at 5:45 PM, Hans Gerber wrote:
> >
> >>> We only want spamd to listen on '--socketpath=path'. Spamc should
> >be>> invoked from within .procmailrc.
> >>
> >> I could not get this m
om within .procmailrc.
>
> I could not get this method to work.
It does work, afaik unix-socket should be cheaper with Resssources than
TCP_Socket.
Thx for your feedback.
Hans
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
B
Hello,
Hans Gerber schrieb :
> Now there is also the 'spamd --auth-ident' option available. Now my
> question: Is anyone using this option and can it assure that spamd
> wont use any but the user_prefs of the user that is calling spamc?
So far I am not able to get -
it assure that spamd
wont use any but the user_prefs of the user that is calling spamc?
We only want spamd to listen on '--socketpath=path'. Spamc should be
invoked from within .procmailrc.
Thx and nice holidays to everyone.
Cheers,
Hans
--
still the original text
without the word spam.
any ideas ?
bests regards
hans
--
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tuto
still the original text
without the word spam.
any ideas ?
bests regards
hans
--
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.
usr/sbin/spamd line 660.
Can somebody give me a hint?
Tank you very much for help
Hans-Juergen
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations
Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge
We want to know
That was my mistake abou the permissions, they were 1777.
- Original Message -
From: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Problem with 2.43 and DCC
___
up, but then it
hangs at the first email. In top, I can see spamd using 80% or better cpu
time, but nothing is happening. I have a pretty similar system running on
another server, and DCC works just fine. I'm stumped.
Thanks
Hans
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC is available:
/usr/local/bin
/dccproc
Jan 15 11:53:32 littlebird spamd[17640]: debug: entering helper-app run
mode.< sspamd stops here.
Any help greatly appreciated.
Hans Rasmussen
Drafting/GIS Coordinator
SBS Forestry Inc.
250-561-1140
___
Hi All.
I'm running SA 2.43 and I can't get DCC to run. I think I've narrowed the
___
All emails incoming and outgoing from SBS Forestry Inc.
are scanned by Kaspersky Antivirus.
---
This SF
>Hans Vallden wrote:
>> I wonder if anyone has made any attempts to install Spamassassin to
>> Mac OS X/Mac OS X Server? I would be VERY interested in doing so.
>> Heck, I might even pay some money for specific instructions.
>
>http://rhumba.pair.com/ben/docs/sa.h
Hello all!
I wonder if anyone has made any attempts to install Spamassassin to
Mac OS X/Mac OS X Server? I would be VERY interested in doing so.
Heck, I might even pay some money for specific instructions.
--
--
Hans Vallden
[EMAIL PROTECTED
hi there,
if anyone is interested, I have attached my german
translation of the SpamAssassin messages.
there are some body test messages missing, I will add them
asap.
/hd
--
_
Hans-Dieter Stich
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
16 matches
Mail list logo
