-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, Rick Macdougall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Outlook can not forward as attachment correctly. Header lines, received
> lines etc, all gone.
>
well, back to your original question then sa-learn is having trouble
eating non valid rfc822 m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
the pop3 protocol does not change the contents of the message. Hence,
anybody downloading it their mail via pop or accessing it via IMAP has
the same options later downstream, should their client of choice permit.
Forwarding a mail as an attachment i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Garth Serjeantson wrote:
> I've seen several different ways of doing this. I was wondering if
> there is a general consensus on which is the best way of configuring SA
> for PF on a RH8 box. Any thoughts?
I'm very happy with a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>
> So, as you see, it didn't pass the five-poit-barrier. I'm getting tired of
> adding new lines to the /etc/mail/access...
>
> Any ideas, will be well received.
>
a somewhat long term way to deal with this is to report the spam to
things like www.s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There are sites like http://www.spamarchive.org/ which exist to collect
spam. Additionally you may want to put that address down in many forums,
websites and so forth as possible. Newsgroups don't get you spammed as
much as publicizing does.
Try seein
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Federico Voges wrote:
> Hi,
hi ho
> Some fscking spammer is sending spam using random email addresses
> (@mydomain.com) for the sender & return addres:
> Any ideas about how to proceed??
if you desire a temporary solution: use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
After having successfully integrated spamassassin via procmail to my
home based mailserver i've started corresponding with my parents'
university, regarding filtering in their facilities.
In my dad's department there's a SunOS mailserver, which does t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm a bit appalled by the crypticism of the Mail::SpamAssassin module
tree, and have yet to figure this one out...
How well does sa-learn know to chew report safe munged spams? i'm hoping
it learns the attached part, because i want it to learn on a ni
