RE: [SAtalk] Why am I having so many problems..spamc not working

I also have to run spamc with the -u flag to get it to work. I use "-u root". If I didn't add the -u root it would run as the user qmailq and fail every time. At the time I made the change people on this list told me I was wrong, but I'm certain that it fixed my problem. If I remove it, spamc

RE: [SAtalk] SA doesn't see everything in local.cf

suggestion. Thanks for the help. -Original Message- From: Greg Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 8:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SA doesn't see everything in local.cf On 27 February 2002, Woodworth, Eric said: > On 2 of my boxes, wh

[SAtalk] SA doesn't see everything in local.cf

I have 3 e-mail boxes all configured exactly the same with qmail, qmail-scanner, and SA. The boxes work fine all things considered but I do have 1 problem. On 2 of my boxes, when I edit local.cf and change required_hits to 7, it doesn't take. When I check my spam reports it still tells me that

[SAtalk] SA doesn't see everything in local.cf

Hmmm, I already sent this to the list but I dont see it in there so I guess I'll try 1 more time. Sorry if this shows twice. I have 3 e-mail boxes all configured exactly the same with qmail, qmail-scanner, and SA. The boxes work fine all things considered but I do have 1 problem. On 2 of my b

[SAtalk] question about the HTTP_CTRL_CHARS_HOST rule please

Hi all! Ok, so I figured out exactly what this rule was doing (nice refresher on reg ex, which I needed anyway) but I have a question. Why is using control code evidence of spam? Especially because this rule gives 4 points, so it seems like it's considered pretty heavy evidence of spam

[SAtalk] Non-english spam

Anybody have any rules to stop Portuguese spam?:) Seems somebody in my company gets pounded with Brazilian spam. I could probably fashion something myself, but if somebody has something premade that'd be great. Anybody else have a problem with non-english spam? Thanks in advance for any he

RE: [SAtalk] Has anybody gotten SA to work with Qmail and Qmail s canner?

g -u root a bad thing in any way? -Original Message- From: Dallas Engelken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 10:17 AM To: Woodworth, Eric Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Has anybody gotten SA to work with Qmail and Qmail s canner? > Well in my insta

RE: [SAtalk] Has anybody gotten SA to work with Qmail and Qmail s canner?

seen other people with posts like mine on the qmail-scanner mail list so I know I'm not alone. -Original Message- From: Dallas Engelken To: Woodworth, Eric Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 2/11/02 8:14 PM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Has anybody gotten SA to work with Qmail and Qmail s canner? > W

[SAtalk] Can't seem to get Spamassassin to work properly

Here's my setup: I have a vanilla install of Red Hat linux running a fairly plain Intel server. I have Q-mail, Q-mail Scanner, and Sophos AV running. All 3 of these worked fine before trying to install Spamassassin. When I install SA downloaded 2.01 and used the perl makefile to do the install.

RE: [SAtalk] Installation problem

nd with luck it might fix my problem but if anybody has other ideas I'd be happy to hear them. -Original Message- From: Craig Hughes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:57 PM To: Woodworth, Eric Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Install

[SAtalk] Installation problem

I did a simple install of Spam Assassin today using the make install method as follows: perl Makefile.PL make make install When I test my setup with: spamassassin -t < sample-nonspam.txt > nonspam.out spamassassin -t < sample-spam.txt > spam.out it produces the .out files like it should but I