11, 2002 3:12 PM
To: Victor O'Rear
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Restoring user_prefs functionality to spamd
Victor O'Rear said:
> OK, is there a tutorial so the ISP can enable user_rules without opening
the
> security hole mentioned in the below?
oops, hold o
kes spamassassin
almost useless.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 3:12 PM
To: Victor O'Rear
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Restoring user_prefs functionality to spamd
Victor O'Rear said:
> OK, is the
s you have some other way of ensuring that users'
tests are safe. Don't use this unless you are certain you know what you are
doing. As you can see, its a security hole.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 3:25 AM
To
Found the answer here
http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/11679/2002/8/200/9430566/
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassi
Spamd, by default, ignores user/.spamassassin/user_prefs, for "security" and
performance reasons.
How can I restore user_prefs functionality? (Besides not using spamd?)
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
Could someone post the answer to the list?
-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 10:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] sample userprefs rules?
Could some kind soul point me to a sample userprefs file with a goodly set
of
user defined rules?
Thanks!
--
R o b
How can I stop, preferably at the user_prefs file, spamassassin from
modifying the messages? My users don't mind modifying the subject line, but
HTML mail is destroyed by the email.
I suspect the only way is use the white-list option.
---
Thi
