Title: Message
It
depends on which networks you want to run SA for. I currently have it
running on all of my networks, like you last example.
-Original Message-From: kittonian
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003
2:47 PMTo: Vee Persaud; [EMAIL PROTECTED
Title: Message
/etc/tcp.smtp file :
...
10.10.10.10:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl"
...
Add
QS_SPAMASSASSIN=""
Also,
make sure that spamd runs without the -c option.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
se it (the emails have been deleted).
Thx
Vee Persaud
NCS
748-2133
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills
I read the FAQ and saw something about using a different user to run sa-learn and that
it might cause issues WRT to Bayes. Is this correct ? I'm running sa-learn as "root"
and spamd as "spamd" (UID 196).
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by
Another, hopefully not dumb, sa-learn question.
I am quarantining any email that has a score of 8.5 to 15. Should I just run sa-learn
--spam on these messages ?
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in L
Are you using qmail and qmail-scanner ? If so, see below...
qmail-scanner-queue.pl has 2 compile options, scanner="fast_spamassassin" and
scanner="verbose_spamassassin". If you use "fast_spamassassin", spamc is then run
with the -c option, which does not rewrite the subject. Edit qmail-scann
Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 02:24 PM 12/3/2003, Vee Persaud wrote:
>> It got a score of 3.3. I ran sa-learn --spam on this message and
>> now I get a score of 3.0 if I resend the message. I'm a bit
>> confused. Did I do something wrong ???
>
> How did you &
ex up to 20 times per day lugpsxw
Thread-Index: AcO5s+amHfQkM0hNS/uYux5VdXtAvgAHMQRA
From: "Vee Persaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Dec 2003 18:59:52.0096 (UTC) FILETIME=[A1D4EA00:01C3B9CF]
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Checker-Versi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I received an email on one of my systems that is not running SA and I
> decided to forward it to my SA system to see if it would get
> rejected. The subject was "Have amazing s\ex up to 20 times per day
> lugpsxw". They use the "/" in the body also to avoid spam detect
I received an email on one of my systems that is not running SA and I decided to
forward it to my SA system to see if it would get rejected. The subject was "Have
amazing s\ex up to 20 times per day lugpsxw". They use the "/" in the body also
to avoid spam detection. It got a score of 3.3
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Chris Barnes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 12:53 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: [SAtalk] Re: BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS
>>
>>
>> Rich Puhek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Now to see if the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having an odd problem with SpamAssassin 2.60, Qmail-Scanner 1.20
> and "net"qmail 1.04 compiled from source (RedHat 9).
>
> I have ran spamd in debug mode and looked at the spamd script to
> verify my config files are located here:
>
> /usr/share/spamassass
How can I tell that SA is actually using these rules (located in
/etc/mail/spamassassin/bigevil.cf) ?
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN's Audience Survey.
Help shape OSDN's sites and tell us what you think. Take this
five minute su
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> BIG HUGE NEWS
>
> A major breakthrough has taken place
>
> ALL EVILRULES FILES HAVE BEEN COMBINED!! 2622 domains into 178
> rules!!! Ramdon/tracking hosts tags removed!
>
> They only increase spamd memory by 1 meg!!! 1 meg!
>
> You read correctly! Every ev
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 1 Dec 2003 Vee Persaud ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>>> so do any of you nice people out there know how to delete / reject
>>>> tagged spam with a score of greater than say 15.
>>>
>>> This is described in the SA documentat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 1 Dec 2003 Robert Harrison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>
>> Lots of helpfull people say this can be done by configuring SA to do
>> it.
>
> I have never seen anyone say that.
I've seen mention of it many times, but this is not the point.
>
>
>> so do any of yo
Hi,
I'm using qmail, qmail-scanner and spamassassin and they are working
great. Now I would like to introduce some more filtering, such as
moving tagged items to a separate mailbox/mailboxes (depending on
recipient), etc. Can this be done in SA ? Any advice ??
Thanks
---
The problem was that qmail-scanner-queue.pl was running spamc with the -c option (not
sure what this option does, check only ??). Once I removed this option, SA worked as
expected.
-Original Message-
From: Vee Persaud
Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2003 11:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi,
I have a problem where SA is not rewriting the subject line. Any ideas on what I'm
missing ?
LOCAL.CF
required_hits 5.0
rewrite_subject 1
subject_tag This could be SPAM*
dns_available no
LOG
Thu, 27 Nov 2003 09:26:29 %z:1742: scanloop: scanner=spamassassin,plain_text_ms
Hi,
I am very new to Spamassassin. I just installed Spamassassin on a Solaris 7 box. I
use Qmail and I'm using Qmail scanner. My problem is that I cannot seem to get SPAMC
to run for my mail. If I run the test that was supplied with qmail-scanner, it works
(this uses qmail-inject). When I
20 matches
Mail list logo
