[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > I'm having an odd problem with SpamAssassin 2.60, Qmail-Scanner 1.20 > and "net"qmail 1.04 compiled from source (RedHat 9). > > I have ran spamd in debug mode and looked at the spamd script to > verify my config files are located here: > > /usr/share/spamassassin > /etc/mail/spamassassin > /home/spamd/.spamassassin/user_prefs > > I'm running spamd using daemontools with this set of flags: > /usr/bin/spamd -m 20 -L -u spamd -H /home/spamd > > when I run it like that using -D too, everything looks great. I have a > test rule set up to = 200 points, and see this at the very end: > > debug: is spam? score=200 required=5 tests=JWM_TEST2 > logmsg: identified spam (200.0/5.0) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:508 in 0.1 > seconds, 776 bytes. > debug: cleaned up kid 3595, pool=20 > > When I get the message it has X-Spam-Status: Yes in the headers > (hits=200.0 required=5.0) ... but the subject doesn't get rewritten > and there's no report. > > I'm just using the custom report in /usr/share/spamassassin/10_misc.cf > > my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf file (which is readable by the > spamd account) contains this plus my test rule: > > required_hits 5 > rewrite_subject 1 > report_safe 1 > subject_tag ***** SPAM **** > allow_user_rules 1 > > I also tried putting that into /home/spamd/.spamassassin/user_prefs > but it didn't help. I then put that in > /usr/share/spamassassin/10_misc.cf as a test even though I know > that's not where it really goes... and it still didn't help. I can't > see anything in the -D info when running spamd that talks about using > a report or not, or rewriting the subject or not. It just says its > spam and uses the X-Spam-Flag: YES but doesn't rewrite the subject. > > It bugs me because my custom rule is getting used just fine, just not > the rewrite_Subject and report_safe 1... (which is set to the default > of 1 in /usr/share/spamassassin/ anyway). > > I restarted spamd after each config change.. and checked the FAQ.. any > ideas? Is it because spamd is running in "taint" mode as the user > spamd (which is set to use the /sbin/nologin shell in redhat9)? I > still need to try running spamd without the -u and -H flags but I was > hoping to be able to use them. I also need to check more, maybe > there's a clear_report_whatever command somewhere that's erasing the > default report? But it should still be rewriting the subject, argh.. > > Take care, > Jeremy > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN's Audience Survey. > Help shape OSDN's sites and tell us what you think. Take this > five minute survey and you could win a $250 Gift Certificate. > http://www.wrgsurveys.com/2003/osdntech03.php?site= > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
qmail-scanner-queue.pl has 2 compile options, scanner="fast_spamassassin" and scanner="verbose_spamassassin". If you use "fast_spamassassin", spamc is then run with the -c option, which does not rewrite the subject. Edit qmail-scanner-queue.pl and find spamc where it has the variable (my $spamc_binary='/opt/bin/spamc'; my $spamc_options=' -c -f';) and remove the -c from the options line. The other option is to recompile qmail-scanner-queue.pl with scanner= "verbose_spamassassin". ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN's Audience Survey. Help shape OSDN's sites and tell us what you think. Take this five minute survey and you could win a $250 Gift Certificate. http://www.wrgsurveys.com/2003/osdntech03.php?site=8 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
