Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 29, 2002 at 10:35:33AM -0700, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> > > # $head is a Mail::Header object, fyi.
> > > my $SAstatus = $head->get("X-Spam-Status") || "No, tests=\n";
...
> I could do $head->unfold('X-Spam-Status'), but not $SAstatus->unfold()
> ($SAsta
Hi,
after upgrading SA from 2.20 to 2.30, I noticed a change in the
X-Spam-Status header - it used to have everything on one line, i.e.
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=16.4 required=5.0
tests=NO_REAL_NAME,PLING,ONE_HUNDRED_PC_FREE,PORN_4,MAILTO_WITH_SUBJ,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR,WEB_BUGS,SLIGHTLY_UNSAFE_JAV
Hi,
I'd like to keep some incoming spam for further experiments, and I'd
like to keep the e-mails without the SA markup. Is there some
spamassassin switch disabling it? I know I can remove the markup with
-d, but the man page says the result "will not be exactly identical",
and anyway it seems pe
Geoff Gibbs wrote:
> Vaclav Barta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asked about religious spam
> including :
> > - chapter & verse
I probably wasn't very clear, but I meant a *concrete* biblical chapter
and verse, not the literal string...
> > - the bible
> The Bible is o
Hi,
not that I need it implemented, :-) but from a theoretical point of
view, is it possible to configure SA so that it correlates incoming
e-mails between different users and tags the same e-mail sent to
everybody as spam? It's not exactly Vipul's Razor (because it's
automatic), but the underlyi
Hi,
I've recently installed SA, and I'm impressed by its precision - but one
spam that got through (attached) suggests a possibility for
improvement...
It has many spam characteristics, and SA (version 2.20) picks up
INVALID_MSGID, LINES_OF_YELLING, LINES_OF_YELLING_2, LINES_OF_YELLING_3,
FORGED
