RE: [SAtalk] Bigevil 2.06f posted.

2004-01-08 Thread Upwood, Jim
I think he means smaller memory usage of the spamd process, not smaller file size... -Jim Jim Upwood System Administrator Bond, Schoeneck, and King Syracuse, NY -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Harris Sent: Thursday, January 08, 200

RE: [SAtalk] Bad Email Address

2004-01-06 Thread Upwood, Jim
I agree, I have sendmail set up to reject everything coming into this domain, and individual OK rules for all valid e-mail addresses. These addresses/aliases are pulled from the active directory once a night, then dynamically builds the sendmail "access" file. -Jim Jim Upwood System Administrator

[SAtalk] Auto disable rules...

2004-01-05 Thread Upwood, Jim
This would be a neat feature add-on for SA: - Mail gets scanned by SA, log written to syslog - Hit freqs get parsed in real-time and written to a mySQL table - All rules are in another mySQL table, including custom rules - Once a week a cron job kicks off and compares hit frequencies with rules ba

RE: [SAtalk] difference between spamassassin and symantec

2003-11-25 Thread Upwood, Jim
Title: Message I use both, SA first (with ClamA/V), then  passes it to Symantec SMTP gateway (Running on Win2k3) then to exchange.  When your talking AV, it's always good to have a couple of different defenses.  But Symantec is an A/V scanner, not a true Bayesian/point system spam filter, ye

RE: [SAtalk] Really bad Infoworld article

2003-11-23 Thread Upwood, Jim
Just an FYI, when I roll out SA to a client, I include $500/year charge for software upgrades, this way they always stay current. It is easier to get that $$ up front than down the road. Software upgrades are done in the comfort of my house, using SSH and webmin, usually taking only a couple hour

[SAtalk] www.no-spam-today.com hmmmm

2003-11-18 Thread Upwood, Jim
I know this has been brought up before, but as I read the posts, my questions still aren't answered... If they are using the open source SA, why can't I download the source to their program? You can't tell me they haven't modified it. This just doesn't seem right... I installed a copy of their p

[SAtalk] Productivity...long...

2003-11-13 Thread Upwood, Jim
Hi all, SA and this list is great, here is some reading material... I must be lucky, and don't have the problem of 2 mailboxes, we re-route the spam to a single spam box on the exchange server, only accessible by 2 users, the IT director and myself. If someone "complains" about not gettin

RE: [SAtalk] spamd consumes huge amounts of memory

2003-11-10 Thread Upwood, Jim
Upgrade your version of perl to 5.8.x -Jim Jim Upwood System Administrator Bond, Schoeneck, and King Syracuse, NY -Original Message- From: Margit Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 9:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] spamd consumes huge amounts

RE: [SAtalk] sa-learn via email

2003-11-06 Thread Upwood, Jim
We are set up the same way. This is what I do: Have a folder called "ham" in my outlook I periodically drag ham to that folder I then have an outlook rule that I only run on demand This rule is set to "redirect" all messages in that folder to an e-mail alias pointing to an mbox located on the SA

RE: [SAtalk] Can you customize the body of a spam message

2003-11-04 Thread Upwood, Jim
Can you customize this part? "The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe to open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus, or confirm that your address can receive spam. If you wish to view it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with

RE: [SAtalk] Re: [OT] What is next step?

2003-10-30 Thread Upwood, Jim
. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 1:13 AM To: Upwood, Jim Subject: Spam Stats for 10/29/2003 Bond, Schoeneck and King Spam Statistics Total Incoming Internet E-mail (For REAL bsk users): 8185 Total Spam found by Spa

RE: [SAtalk] adding SPAM hits score to headers

2003-10-17 Thread Upwood, Jim
Yes: **SPAM** _HITS_ -Jim Jim Upwood System Administrator Bond, Schoeneck, and King Syracuse, NY -Original Message- From: Diego Puppin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 8:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] adding SPAM hits score to headers Dear all

RE: [SAtalk] RBL check

2003-10-09 Thread Upwood, Jim
I fixed this by lowering the scores of my RBL checks. I still use RBLs but none of them have a score of more than 1.0 -Jim -Original Message- From: Covington, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 9:41 AM To: Scott Harris; SpamAssassin-Talk list Subject: RE: [