[SAtalk] Thoughts...

2003-01-07 Thread Tobias von Koch
Although it is nice to hear that SA is becoming that successful - even global players like NAI are getting interested in it -, the acquisition of Deersoft by NAI will change - and has already changed - the community project which SA is. SA is licensed under the same terms as Perl itself, this mean

[SAtalk] NAI buys Deersoft

2003-01-06 Thread Tobias von Koch
Hi, just found this on REUTERS: http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=technologyNews&storyID=1997874 and in German http://www.heise.de/newsticker/data/anw-06.01.03-003/ Wow, this one killed me. tobias -- === .deSecure, Bahnhofstr.

Re: [SAtalk] Razor2 and SA 2.43 problem

2002-10-31 Thread Tobias von Koch
Hi, On Thu, 31 Oct 2002 12:40:16 +, Ben Edwards wrote: BE> Hi BE> BE> I am experiencing a new problem with Razor2 since upgrading BE> SpamAssassin to 2.43. Razor2 checks are failing with the following BE> error: BE> BE> Oct 31 12:17:35 www spamd[32514]: razor2 check skipped: Bad file BE> de

Re: [SAtalk] razor port

2002-07-17 Thread Tobias von Koch
Hi, On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 15:30:48 -0400, Vince Puzzella wrote: VP> Never mind. Did a "man spamd" and it told me 783 by default. That's probably not what you want. 783/tcp is only used by spamd and I doubt you want to connect to a spamd somewhere outside your network. DCC uses port 6277/udp and

Re: [SAtalk] rule testing against corpus

2002-07-07 Thread Tobias von Koch
Hi, On Sun, 7 Jul 2002 14:52:41 +0200 (CEST), Tony L. Svanstrom wrote: TLS> On Sat, 6 Jul 2002 the voices made Patrice Fournier write: TLS> TLS> > body LOCAL_LONG_WORD /[a-zA-Z]{90}/ TLS> > describe LOCAL_LONG_WORD LOCAL: Long random word in body (90 TLS> > chars+) scoreLOCAL_LONG_WO

Re: [SAtalk] Re: spam filtering in high-volume environments

2002-06-18 Thread Tobias von Koch
On Tue, 18 Jun 2002 09:30:06 -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: D> | Hmmm...would it be safe to assume that any attachment type of D> text/| should be scanned while anything else should not? D> D> Some mailers have quite a bit of brain damage and will tag a plain D> text attachment as "applicat

Re: [SAtalk] Error output with latest CVS

2002-06-06 Thread Tobias von Koch
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002 10:46:56 -0700 (PDT), Craig R Hughes wrote: CRH> Yes, I just noticed this myself. I think it's a bug in the patch CRH> from Bugzilla#343 -- looks like a copy/paste bug -- how can you CRH> expect to read from a descriptor which perl just told you it failed CRH> to open... oh y

Re: [SAtalk] problem with load of triplets.txt?

2002-05-22 Thread Tobias von Koch
On Wed, 22 May 2002 11:08:29 +0200, Tobias von Koch wrote: TVK> Yes, this option seems not to be in the current CVS .cf files. TVK> TVK> But do we really need an extra option for the path of this file? TVK> triplets.txt normally is in one of the standard rules directories TVK&

Re: [SAtalk] problem with load of triplets.txt?

2002-05-22 Thread Tobias von Koch
On Tue, 21 May 2002 12:06:06 -0500, Neulinger, Nathan wrote: NN> NN> This code: NN> NN> if (!$triplets_loaded) { NN> my $filename = $self->{main}->{rules_filename} . NN> "/triplets.txt"; NN> NN> if (!open (TRIPLETS, "<$filename")) { NN> dbg ("failed to open '$filename', can

Re: [SAtalk] Ughhh... High Processor Utilization

2002-05-21 Thread Tobias von Koch
hi, On Tue, 21 May 2002 08:50:57 -0500, Joel Epstein wrote: JE> I've been using Spam Assassin for a few months now and find it to be JE> a fantastic project. My thanks go out to the team! JE> JE> I do have one major issue though; Whenever files with large JE> attachments ( > 4mb )are sent into

Re: [SAtalk] new SpamAssassin install trouble

2002-05-13 Thread Tobias von Koch
Hi, On Sun, 12 May 2002 20:35:53 -0700, Harold Hallikainen wrote: HH> Actually, it LOOKS like SpamAssassin is working. I'm getting HH> incoming spam properly identified. So, maybe it runs without gdbm HH> even being there. One curious thing, though: I have not yet created HH> a .forward file. Can

Re: [SAtalk] [PATCH] DCC Support for SA

2002-04-30 Thread Tobias von Koch
Hi, On Tue, 30 Apr 2002 04:32:23 -0600, Michael Moncur wrote: MM> > Seems to work fine for me. I've switched the require IPC::Open2 MM> > to use IPC::Open2 but moved it to the top of the file. Also MM> > removed the= {} from the MM> > hash declaration. All seems to work OK on my linux machine.

[SAtalk] [PATCH] DCC Support for SA

2002-04-28 Thread Tobias von Koch
Hi, attached is a patch which adds support for the Distributed Checksum Clearinghouse (DCC) System to spamassassin. As discussed earlier on this list, DCC is a system similar to Razor, which supports fuzzy checksums. Please note: I did some tests with the patch and it *appears* to work. But I