Qmailscanner (http://qmail-scanner.sourceforge.net/) does this. You
can configure any kind of stripping complete with explanations in the
return... Qmailscanner works with spamd to spam-check the emails
flowing through the system...
It's currently the only way I know how to run SA in an
y opt-in would have to be from the parents approving the
delivery of NONFILTERED emails.
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Craig R Hughes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 12:24 PM
> > To: Smith, Rick
> > Cc: Rich Wellner; Christopher
In a school, I don't believe there should be any privacy for email
toward students... it's not "their" account.
> -Original Message-
> From: Craig R Hughes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 12:27 PM
> To: Matt Sergeant
> Cc: Christopher Davis; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Same here.
SA RULES.
> -Original Message-
> From: Tyler Hardison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 3:13 PM
> To: Nick Fisher; Rose, Bobby; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Spam Assassin
>
>
> On 4/5/02 12:00 PM, "Nick Fisher" <[EMA
Has anyone ever considered setting up a CVS site for the RULES only ?
That might be worth it... a CVS update with a script that allowed us to
rollback to a previous rule level, but all the while maintaining the
newest set of rules for the whole kit-n-kaboodle of spam/mers
-Or
How long do you think it will be until users of SA face the same
consequences as the now infamous ORBZ case ?
I'm sure that some lawyer out there could find a way to sue someone for
running this package.
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROT
ent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:32 PM
> To: Smith, Rick
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] MIME problems
>
>
> Rick, not positive this answers your questions, but:
>
> you can currently make the report appear only in the headers,
> thereby not
> breaking
If it'd be the same subject all the time, you could weight that subject
with a really big negative number in the rules and then SA will pass it
through...
> -Original Message-
> From: Olivier Nicole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 11:08 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECT
cd /usr/ports/databases/gdbm
make all install
:)
> -Original Message-
> From: Ray Curtis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 9:33 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] spamc
>
>
>
> I am trying to get SA setup on a Freebsd system and have so far gott
The problem with this approach is that some of us deal with clueless
people, and the even more clueless Exchange Server which hides all
internet headers when reading the message in Outlook.
Teaching people (and getting them to remember it) about clicking the
View menu / options to even SEE the
I realize there's a fix in the works for the problem with the report
being only in the header when the spam in question is MIME encoded.
I noticed that the CVS comments said that the tests were broken by the
addition of the fix and that it was rolled back.
Any clue when it'll be released with
Jim -
Have you gotten any response to your email (attached below for
reference) ? I'm interested in BOTH options.
Rick
-- Attached message below ---
Message: 8057506
FROM: Jim Paris
DATE: 03/09/2002 20:36:05
SUBJECT: [SAtalk] More complex customizations (
12 matches
Mail list logo
