Re: [SAtalk] way to override system-wide whitelist?

2002-05-01 Thread Sean Harding
ere some easy way to "unset" these? Couldn't you just create a new rule for them and give it a huge score (or just +100 if you only want to cancel out the whitelist)? sean -- Sean Harding [EMAIL PROTECTED] | "Jane, what if he worships you?" http://www.dogcow.org/sean/

Re: [SAtalk] Another false positive

2002-04-29 Thread Sean Harding
stinfo/spamassassin-talk > MM> > MM> > MM> > > > ___ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk -- Sean Harding [EMAIL PROTECTED] | &qu

[SAtalk] Another false positive

2002-04-29 Thread Sean Harding
contains a unique ID number sean -- Sean Harding [EMAIL PROTECTED] | "How can I wash my sins away with http://www.dogcow.org/sean/ | the water from this poisoned stream?" | --The Nields ___ Spama

Re: [SAtalk] Text as images

2002-04-25 Thread Sean Harding
now better, and I'd rather avoid losing messages from my friends. In any case, the message in question was caught by SA for other reasons, so it didn't actually get through. I've attached a copy to this message. sean -- Sean Harding [EMAIL PROTECTED] | "Somet

[SAtalk] Text as images

2002-04-25 Thread Sean Harding
Another annoying one this morning...I got two copies of a spam that were just HTML with img tags. The images contained the text of the message. Yet another way to make it difficult (nearly impossible) to analyze the text of the message. Sigh. sean -- Sean Harding [EMAIL PROTECTED] | "

[SAtalk] uuencoded spam

2002-04-23 Thread Sean Harding
ld show as a normal message? Or are they just hoping that people will manually decode it to see what it is? sean -- Sean Harding [EMAIL PROTECTED] | "It's better to have fallen in love http://www.dogcow.org/sean/ | than never to have fallen at all"

Re: [SAtalk] USER_IN_WHITELIST when it isn't?

2002-04-17 Thread Sean Harding
On Wed Apr 17 at 02:11:19 PM, Craig R Hughes wrote: > /usr/share/spamassassin/60_whitelist.cf > > Are you hitting any of those? Ahh, yes. Actually I am. My employer's domain name is in there. That explains it. Thanks. sean -- Sean Harding [EMAIL PROTECTED] | "Fo

Re: [SAtalk] USER_IN_WHITELIST when it isn't?

2002-04-17 Thread Sean Harding
On Wed Apr 17 at 12:24:10 PM, Michael C. Hanson wrote: > auto-whitelist is enabled. I thought that would trigger the AWL rule, not the USER_IN_WHITELIST rule? sean -- Sean Harding [EMAIL PROTECTED] | "We greet each other in a http://www.dogcow.org/sean/ | wild profusion

[SAtalk] USER_IN_WHITELIST when it isn't?

2002-04-17 Thread Sean Harding
*@Variety.cahners1.com whitelist_from *@winebrats.org (and my work email address doesn't match any of those). Is it because the username is the same as mine? Or the real name? Is there some hidden hard-coded whitelist I'm not aware of? sean -- Sean Harding [EMAIL PROTECTED] | "Mor

Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin does not build on SunOS

2002-04-11 Thread Sean Harding
On Thu Apr 11 at 05:25:49 PM, Matt Sergeant wrote: > Wouldn't we be better off sticking a sparc linux install disk image in the > contrib directory for SunOS users? ;-) Gross! Stop that! sean -- Sean Harding [EMAIL PROTECTED] | "No one can save us http://www.dogcow.org/se

Re: [SAtalk] "Here is the information you requested"

2002-04-10 Thread Sean Harding
ploited formmail means that the rule is unnecessary. sean -- Sean Harding [EMAIL PROTECTED] | "No one can save us http://www.dogcow.org/sean/ | but Kim the waitress" | --Material Issue ___ Spamassassin-

[SAtalk] "Here is the information you requested"

2002-04-10 Thread Sean Harding
/grant3.htm Regards' P.K. Marketing If you are no longer interested in this offer please email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- sean -- Sean Harding [EMAIL PROTECTED] | "She&#

[SAtalk] Common phrases

2002-03-30 Thread Sean Harding
es. if you have subscribed for by entering your email follow the link below and allow is an opt in service that -- Sean Harding [EMAIL PROTECTED] | "Nobody ever went broke underestimating http://www.dogcow.org/sean/ | the taste of the American public."

Re: [SAtalk] Negative scores for obvious spam attributes?

2002-03-29 Thread Sean Harding
be willing to bet that Sendmail is used for spam a lot more, actually, since there's so much more Sendmail out there). sean -- Sean Harding [EMAIL PROTECTED] | "It's funny how you never know http://www.dogcow.org/sean/ | exactly when you're asked to grow."

Re: [SAtalk] Slashdot: Class Action Lawsuit Against Spammer

2002-03-15 Thread Sean Harding
s far as I can tell from the press release, it's not a class action suit, though. I don't know where the slashdot poster got that information. sean -- Sean Harding [EMAIL PROTECTED] | "You tried to make me doubt, to make me http://www.dogcow.org/sean/ | guess,

Re: [SAtalk] sendmail rules vs. SA

2002-03-13 Thread Sean Harding
g. This includes blacklisted domains and IP addresses, etc. I'd prefer to bounce the message immediately when I can. sean -- Sean Harding [EMAIL PROTECTED] | "I say I'll be fine, http://www.dogcow.org/sean/ | but I don't think that I will"

[SAtalk] another mass-check question

2002-03-12 Thread Sean Harding
from that folder that have already been submitted? Or is it ok to have dupes? Thanks. sean -- Sean Harding [EMAIL PROTECTED] | "we all try to frame our face http://www.dogcow.org/sean/ | in a background of success"