Yoda has turned to the DIM side and started spamming. :)
^^^
Should we classify spammers as evil, or just incredibly lack-witted?
> -Original Message-
> From: Evan Platt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 11:36 AM
> To: SpamAssassin
> Subjec
>> I could almost bet my left index finger on the fact that 99%
>> of those PGP-signatures are invalid. This is something that
>> SA could exploit.
>I'll profess some degree of ignorance about PGP signatures, but does it
matter if it's valid or not? Couldn't a spammer generate a perfectly valid
Jeremy Turner [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> keep statistics for a "X strikes and you are out"
>> milter to deny access completely for X minutes when they hit too many
>> bad addresses or have a 0 ham to X spam ratio.
> Sounds like an MTA thing, not really a SpamAssassin thing. I would point
you to your
Search the recent archive for teergrubing, (I called it a spambump, like a
speedbump in a parking lot). Basically you send continuation messages every
15-60 seconds, a perfectly legitimate RFC, you just keep it up until you or
the other side gives up.
I believe Marc Merlin (Hi Marc) on the list h
Following up on the offers (should now test for offer[sz]) in the headers
these also seem to be seen frequently in the headers as usernames or
embedded in domain names.
waaay back Malte said:
> | | Subject: Re: [SAtalk] "offers" in header a good rule for trapping
> | | spam
> | |
> | | AFAIK di
That's what VPNs are for, PPTP is built in to NT4 and L2TP into W2K and XP.
Not quite as secure, given the current security I would guess their
passwords are probably trivially easy to brute force, would be set up a
terminal services (application mode) on a server and load the needed
applications
Steve,
I found this perl script to convert .msg to mbox on a metacrawler search,
care to try it?
http://www.xs4all.nl/~mvz/software/msgconv.html
-Original Message-
From: Steve Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 6:39 PM
To: SpamTalk
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Outlook dropped the post in the folder too, hee hee, proving the superiority
of a scoring based system and a binary dumper.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
As an ISP with customer that need to communicate worldwide these are far to
inclusive to implement on our servers.
They would probably be most useful on private SA installs where the scope of
email communications is generally pretty narrow and US based. The infrequent
exceptions could be adjusted
Original proposal posted December 2001, heh. "Nothing new under the sun".
To answer my own question, mySQL _does_ do replication the bad news is that
the files are not OS/archetecture agnostic, you cannot replicate between a
Sun unix and RH Linux, so it does not appear to be a viable distribution
http://www.iks-jena.de/mitarb/lutz/usenet/teergrube.en.html
I call this kind of delay introduction a "spambump", like speedbumps used to
slow you down in a parking lot. It does not surprise me that someone else
has already though of it.
Basically it consist of sending a continuation instead of "
> required_hits 6.1
...
> score RAPE 4.125
...
> rape rape rape
I think it only counts once. Since 4.125 < 6.1 makes it not spam.
Of course your total showed 0.9, as others noted, restarting spamd would
also be needed.
-Original Message-
From: Joel Epstein [mailto:[EMAIL
I'd like to invoke it as a sendmail milter to strip them before SA has a
chance to score them. I think it would be valuable in reducing false
positives. The real trick would be to get it to autolearn the format of the
trailer for each domain in a list.
-Original Message-
From: Tony L. Sva
= "-u";
argv[2] = "spamd";
argv[3] = 0;
Any chancee this fallback issue is fixed in SA v2.31?
-Original Message-
From: Robert Strickler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 6:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] RH 7.3 spamass-m
) to spamd failed: Connection refused
so evidently that is not the fix. Any hints on how to get spamd to process
the mail?
-Original Message-----
From: Robert Strickler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 5:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] RH 7.3 spamass-mi
Better revision at line 128 add:
daemon(0, 1);
cout << PACKAGE << " " << VERSION << " demonized." << endl;
-Original Message-
From: Robert Strickler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 5:00 PM
To: &
http://i.yak.net/twiki/bin/view/Fnord/SpamAssassinHowtoRedhat72#Get_spamass_
milter notes that
"spamass-sock doesn't deamonize itself"
Anybody want to team up to fix this? We really want to get this working. I
know there is a daemon(3). Although I am totally unfamiliar with c++, the
code does not
How does everyone feel about building the logic to create and maintain a
database of unsubscribe/removes that actually remove an address. I realize
that a significant majority of these are simply traps to validate email
addresses, but I am wondering if there is not some value in actually getting
o
18 matches
Mail list logo
