u64. My guess is it has something to
do with the Perl installation but I'm not sure yet.
--
___
Rick Beebe(203) 785-6416
Manager, Systems & Network Engineering
Rick Beebe wrote:
I just updated my production SA environment from 2.41 to 2.60 and am
running into load issues. I'm running SA on a 2-node Tru64 cluster. Each
node has 4 gigs of memory and dual 667mHz Alpha CPUs. We process about
150,000 messages per day but, of course, it isn'
H 9.0.
Thanks. I'll keep an eye on that. In my case I'm only using a global
directory--there are no per-user files. No AWL and a single global
bayes. I'll keep an eye out for lock files there.
--
____
I really don't want to go back to 2.4. I am
using a system-wide bayes. I'm not sure how much drag that adds either.
--
___
Rick Beebe(203) 785-6416
Manager, Systems & N
Don Krause wrote:
How can "PENIS" be offensive? It's a medically correct term.
Just offer to turn off SA for those who are so easily offended. I'm sure
they'd prefer PENIS to the content of the actual mail.
Yes, it's medically correct. In all the cases where someone complained,
however, there wa
I'd like to appeal to the SA collective to change the name of the
PENIS_ENLARGE tests to something a little more innocuous. Apparently
some people find it offensive to see it in their email. I've received
the odd complaint about the test name--usually when it shows up in a
message that isn't ab
Scott Lambert wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 10:01:21AM -0400, Chris Santerre wrote:
"Of course, you probably need to use a userprefs database in that case,
rather than the userprefs in each user's home directory."
Aside from moving the process to another system, Are you saying that seting
up t
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 01:06:26PM -0700, Seby Varghese wrote:
>
>>I have the SpamAssassin installed site wide and would
>>like to know there is a way to configure that if the
>>user is in white list don't do any other checks. We
>>need this because 80% of the mail handl
> I'm currently test spamassassin (spamd/spamc) to see if we should
> implement it sitewide here. Is there a way to log how many mails that
> spamassassin tags as spam and how many that aren't counted as spam. If
> it's possible I also want to log the score so we can have our own little
> high sco
Dave Encisco wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When compiling Mail-SpamAssassin-2.31 on an SGI running 6.5.15 I run
> into the following error:
>
> cp lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm blib/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm
> gcc -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -DLANGUAGE_C -O spamd/sp
10 matches
Mail list logo
