[SAtalk] procmailrc

2003-12-02 Thread Rich H.
Hello all, Figured out the error of my ways, (I'm such a bone head). Now I'm having a blast with both SA and procmail. Awesome combo!   Rich

[SAtalk] More .procmailrc

2003-12-02 Thread Rich H.
This box is running RH 7.0 with procmail 3.22-7. What is the proper format of the .procmailrc file? I don't think I have ever seen something so picky. I have my file set up exactly like this: SHELL=/bin/sh PATH=/bin:/usr/bin MAILDIR=$HOME/m

[SAtalk] .procmailrc

2003-12-02 Thread Rich H.
Hello again, I am playing with different recipies of procmailrc, and I am still having some time with features of .procmailrc files. I added a line like   :0:* ^X-Spam-Flag: YES/Spamfolder     In the headers of my message I get   X-Spam-Flag: YES     Yet in the log file I have set up I get a

Re: [SAtalk] Another Procmail question

2003-11-29 Thread Rich H.
> People can be blunt on Usenet. But procmail is not sendmail, so it's > hardly surprising they suggested you go elsewhere. The same would > happen here if you started posting questions about some other > anti-spam software (except we might be more polite than if this were > usenet :-) Very nice

[SAtalk] Delete Spam

2003-11-28 Thread Rich H.
Hello all,   First off let me get the Really Important stuff out of the way, the flattery.   You guys are doing a truly bang up job with SA. I think the whole world should be using it so we could put spammers out of business.     Now the boring questions. Has anyone on this list successfully