Re: [SAtalk] Spamd doesn't want to work correctly

2002-04-09 Thread Paul Rushing
ist.lock : No such file or directory " (Where did > it take this // directory???) -- = Paul Rushing [EMAIL PROTECTED] = ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd Problem

2002-04-08 Thread Paul Rushing
> > Doesn't seem to be working how? Try spamd -D -q and let us know what it says... > spamd won't consider -q without -x try spamd -D -x -q -- ===== Paul Rushing [EMAIL PROTECTED] = Sponsored by http:

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Hi, I am the SpamAssassin maintainer

2002-04-07 Thread Paul Rushing
n pointed out, you would be clear on the facts, and > that if in spite of that, you continued with the same claims, that would > be a bad thing. > > >>Otherwise, I'd happily spice it up even more, and welcome the >>chance of a lawsuit, simply to bri

Re: [SAtalk] auto-whitelist

2002-04-04 Thread Paul Rushing
g it." > -- Tallulah Bankhead > > > >>On 4 Apr 2002, Craig Hughes wrote: >> >> >>>Not really mutually exclusive, just probably AWL won't behave the way >>>you expect... It should be pretty easy to create a SQLBasedWhit

Re: [SAtalk] auto-whitelist

2002-04-04 Thread Paul Rushing
gt; > > > > Not really mutually exclusive, just probably AWL won't behave the way > > > > you expect... It should be pretty easy to create a > SQLBasedWhitelist.pm > > > > for people who want AWL to store stuff in the SQL db. I'm really > pretty

Re: [SAtalk] auto-whitelist

2002-04-03 Thread Paul Rushing
no, auto-whitelist does not use the SQL database. (only uses the dbm file in the user home directory) in the current spamd it appears that SQL and AWL are mutually exclusive, although that's not in the documentation. Larry Rosenman wrote: > If you are using SQL, does the auto-whitelist also