Hello,
I'd like to add spamassassin rules to match certain attachment
filenames, but I can't seem to get it right. I'm trying things like:
rawbody SOBIG_VIRUS
/filename="?application.pif|document_all.pif|thank_you.pif"?/
Any ideas on how to match attachment filenames?
Patrick
-
management wants me to set up an auto-reply to mails marked as spam
by SA. I
told them that this is a very bad idea, since
a.) reply addresses are fakes and not working most of the time anyway
b.) if they DO work, we will just notify the spammers that the
address they
bought/harvested is working
Hello,
On the system I help administer, we deliver spam-flagged messages to an
IMAP folder inside the user's directory. Nightly, a script runs that
deletes messages that are older than 10 days from that folder.
So, there are no flagged messages more than 10 days old. Yet, several
users have up
Well, with all the great material gathered so far, we could just start
semi-randomly auto-generating these response threads and stick them in
the list whenever an e-mail like Marge's comes in. Then we could waste
everyone's time without wasting everyone's time. ;-)
Patrick
On Tuesday, June 3,
Hello,
I'm seeing a bunch of these errors in my syslog file:
spamd[406]: cannot fork: Not enough space
Okay, so swap is filling up on my mail server for some reason, right?
Problem is,
spamd just dies and the message gets delivered into the INBOX unscanned.
Is there a way to return an error
Hello,
Okay, this is nit-picky, but is there a difference between "hits" and
"points" in the SPAM tag?
SPAM: Content analysis details: (6.30 hits, 5 required)
SPAM: NO_REAL_NAME (1.3 points) From: does not include a real
name
SPAM: MARKETING_PARTNERS (1.7 points) BODY: Claims you regi
On Tuesday, December 24, 2002, at 09:40 AM, Jonathan Duncan wrote:
Have you not added them to your blacklist yet?
Sure, I have. They use a new domain every time they send me spam.
I can't keep up. I need some way to filter the source, like something
based on NS records. Luckily, it looks like
On Sunday, December 15, 2002, at 09:43 PM, G. Wayne Kidd wrote:
1) Give the user or the spam-reviewer a mechanism for adding the
sender to the whitelist.
Probably a web based configuration file editor is a good idea. I posted
a meager PHP-based
editor to the list a couple days ago.
2) If the
ignorance or apathy?
I don't know and I don't care."
-- William Safire
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Patrick Bores wrote:
Here's the PHP template I wrote for my small user base (slightly
modified for public consumption).
You'll have to write your own authentication code. All
kable.
Good luck,
Patrick
On Wednesday, December 11, 2002, at 02:27 PM, James D. Stallings wrote:
Yes If you have a URL for this, please publish. That would
be great!!
Thanks
Jim
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Patrick Bores
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Mark,
I posted the file to the SATalk
that forward to their real e-mail addresses, as well as a couple
addresses that deliver locally. I'd like to be able to give everyone,
whether their mail is delivered locally or forwarded, the ability to
tweak their SA prefs).
Thanks for any ideas,
-Mark
Patrick Bores wrote:
I've put
e:
I am definately interested in checking this out. Thanks.
--
Chris LaFrance
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Is sloppiness in speech caused by ignorance or apathy?
I don't know and I don't care."
-- William Safire
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Patrick Bores wrote:
I've put together a
I've put together a web interface that allows users to change the
required_hits, and add/delete blacklist_from, whitelist_from, and
whitelist_to directives. It's written in PHP, and requires that the
user_prefs file have group write permissions for the same group that
the web server runs as.
L
I have a feeling this is one of those wack-a-mole solutions. While is
sounds like lots of fun (! :) ) I feel it might be better to rely on
other
means for scoring this spam. Namely the DNSBLs that specifically look
for
spamhauses like HSM or Razor2. I just don't see any other feasible
solution
Hello,
I have noticed that most of the NS records for these spammers are the
same or similar. Would it be too expensive to do a quick lookup of NS
records to block these guys?
Here are my results:
[whiteout:~] patrick% host -t ns thelst40090hspeedm.com
thelst40090hspeedm.com name server NS1.HS
I run a similar setup with 3 servers and 1 user list (glued together
with NIS). It shouldn't be that difficult.
1. Install SA on each machine in a central directory. Mine is
"/usr/data/spamassassin"
In SA dist directory:
perl Makefile.PL PREFIX=/usr/data/spamassassin/usr
SYSCONFDIR=/usr/data/s
Hello,
I'm trying to deploy SA site-wide and I'm writing a web configuration
tool.
What I would like to do is this:
Have the web configuration tool put the following into the user_prefs
file, like so:
header MY_SUBJECT_TEST Subject=~/subject1/
header MY_SUBJECT_TEST Subject=~/subject2/
header
*nix uses to stop and restart the spamd
service.
-Michael
Patrick Bores <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/11/02 10:34AM >>>
Hello,
I have the following in my user_prefs file:
header MY_WHITELIST Subject=~/test/
score MY_WHITELIST -100
Piping a message to spamassassin applies the rule c
Hello,
I have the following in my user_prefs file:
header MY_WHITELIST Subject=~/test/
score MY_WHITELIST -100
Piping a message to spamassassin applies the rule correctly.
Piping the same message to spamc ignores the rule.
My local.cf file looks like this:
allow_user_rules 1
rewrite_subjec
19 matches
Mail list logo
