A few more examples of tests that should be fine tuned or looked at
suspiciously:
This is (part of) a completely legitimate note, from someone who couldn't
forge a "received" header if her life depended on it.
I've received a number of legitimate notes that tripped the
"RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM" te
This is the accounting I got for a
standard, boring, and completely legitimate response to an e-Bay
question. These things previously got negative scores. Every
such response will earn 5 of these 5.6 points - only the 0.6 points for
NO_REAL_NAME is specific to this particular piece of mail.
Thi
etween the fan
and the exhaust grilles in order to have a super quiet installation. If
hard metal ducting is used the sound levels may not be acceptable.
In Portland our products are sold through Gensco/Albina Wholesale. You may
also call (800) 255-7749 for technical or sales support. Thank you
I've been manually entering what I thought were the original, default
scores for various tests into my user_prefs file. So many had
changed (from late February, when I copied the web page), that I just
checked to see if there had been a general change. What I see makes
no sense.
Why in the worl
>Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 22:36:51 -0500
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Continuing to help the ignorant
>From: Greg Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Some of it was identifiable text, and just too tempting. OK, it's
> > deleted. But what does one do when SA comes to a wrong conclusion
FROM: Greg Ward
DATE: 03/12/2002 07:17:39
SUBJECT: RE: [SAtalk] Help the ignorant
On 11 March 2002, Marsha Hanchrow said:
> I made the mistake of editing my "auto-whitelist.db" to
remove the address
> of an e-Bay seller.
Ummm... *how* did you edit it?
Since I'm forgetti
(My ISP was unable to help, but he's used SpamAssassin for maybe a day more
than I have, and I'm brand new.)
I have not been able, from the documentation, to figure out how to
personalize my setup. The problems I'm currently chewing on are:
I made the mistake of editing my "auto-whitelist.db"
