On 08/19/03 20:54 -0700, Mustafa Kapasi wrote:
Have you examined /var/log/maillog?
John
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by Dice.com.
Did you know that Dice has over 25,000 tech jobs available today? From
careers in IT to Engineering to Tech
On 08/19/03 07:06 +0100, Yorkshire Dave wrote:
>
> There needs to be a page somewhere to explain why bouncing spam is
> bad.
Based on this thread and the reference to the notes on linux.org, I'm
persuaded that attempting to bounce spam is not the right way to go
about this and have amended my pr
I've got my .procmailrc set up to generate an exit code 67 to bounce
spam back to the sender. Problem is the user and domain are not what I
want, which is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Relevant recipe of my .procmailrc:
--
:0 H
* ^X-Spam-Status:.*Yes
{
EXITCODE=67
:0:
spam
}
#
On 08/18/03 12:47 -0500, Chris Barnes wrote:
> What would the procmail script look like that would look at the subject
> line and strip out the *SPAM* if it exists?
I do this, use the following, as I prefer to not have [SAtalk] on the
subject line. This recipe strips out the string and
On 07/13/03 21:58 -0400, John P Verel wrote:
>
> Also, evolution-1.2.2-5.
>
> John
Examination of my maillog shows these two entries:
Jul 13 09:50:11 Verdi spamd[21524]: identified spam (10.2/5.0) for
mary:501 in 0.2 seconds, 3865 bytes.
Jul 13 13:18:13 Verdi spamd[1433]: identifie
On 07/13/03 17:27 -0400, John P Verel wrote:
>
>
> On 07/13/03 13:25 -0500, Thomas Cameron wrote:
> >
> > What does your local.cf look like?
> required_hits 5
> rewrite_subject 1
> subject_tag [SPAM]
> report_safe 0
> always_add_report 1
> dns_ava
On 07/13/03 13:25 -0500, Thomas Cameron wrote:
>
> What does your local.cf look like?
required_hits 5
rewrite_subject 1
subject_tag [SPAM]
report_safe 0
always_add_report 1
dns_available test: 167.206.3.216, 167.206.7.4, 167.206.112.138
whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also, running Red Hat 9.0
Can't figure out now to get SA to re-write headers using Evoluton (my
wife's MUA), where I'm using the Evolution to pop the mail from my ISP.
I have it set up in the filters section, where I simply give
/usr/bin/spamc. SA identifies spam fine and filters to the spam folder,
but no change in heade
On 07/10/03 14:02 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
>
> So in your case you might do:
>
> dns_available test: optonline.net
>
I did this:
dns_available test: 167.206.3.216
... which is the server shown in nslookup.
I also have
nameserver 167.206.3.216
nameserver 167.206.7.4
nameserver 167.206.112
Greetings.
In Mail::SpamSssassin::Conf, there's the option called dns_available. I
want to point this to my ISP's DNS server to speed up the RBL checks.
However, I'm unclear of the syntax of this option, shown as:
dns_available test: server1.ltd, etc.
Can someone clarify how to set this up?
Th
10 matches
Mail list logo
