On 08/19/03 07:06 +0100, Yorkshire Dave wrote:
 > 
> There needs to be a page somewhere to explain why bouncing spam is
> bad.
Based on this thread and the reference to the notes on linux.org, I'm
persuaded that attempting to bounce spam is not the right way to go
about this and have amended my procmail recipe accordingly .  Thanks to
all for the feedback.

John


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to