Re: [SAtalk] Bouncing spam...

2003-02-12 Thread Jeffrey Culverhouse
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003 12:49:32 -0500 Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 12:27:02PM -0500, Jeffrey Culverhouse wrote: > > sendmail spamd/spamc and procmail for local delivery. I assume it is > > procmail that discovers a local address is not

[SAtalk] Spam-Report for non-spam

2003-01-20 Thread Jeffrey Culverhouse
Hey, I put in the small change to PerMsgStatus.pm to add the X-Spam-Report for all email, not just spam, so that if I find a false-negative, it is easier to see what + and - points it *did* get (and not just the RULE names it matched)... It is pretty trivial, but I wondered if anyone else has yet