On Wed, 12 Feb 2003 12:49:32 -0500 Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 12:27:02PM -0500, Jeffrey Culverhouse wrote: > > sendmail spamd/spamc and procmail for local delivery. I assume it is > > procmail that discovers a local address is not valid (since I don't > > think sendmail knows about that stuff), so (not being a procmail guy) is > > No, actually sendmail does that. It calls procmail to do the actual > delivery to the user. Ugh, that makes this a little more difficult... > > > Thoughts??? Anyone done this or gave up trying before?? > > what's the issue you're having? I was just trying to save the effort of bouncing this junk back to nowhere, especially when the 'nowhere' exists, but is not reachable, so my server tries every 30 minutes for 5 days... Probably not all that CPU intensive, but I keep several thousands of email in the outqueue... Along the same lines, I get 30,000+ scans a day (that is just the ones that fail), trying to discover local addresses to send spam to - I guess there is not much to do about that, right?? I am not a big fan of blocking ip ranges to my port 25, but I guess that is about the only option?? jeff -- Jeff Culverhouse * [EMAIL PROTECTED] VP Operations, Rev.Net Technologies, Inc. V 540.772.3282 F 540.772.0573 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
