Lol. I know the feeling. I ended up going straight to SA because at the time
amavis seemed superfluous.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced bra
Reading through a few of the last threads from people asking about
how to implement SA, I noticed how often it's suggested that people Use
Amavis or mailscanner, or similar to act as a go-between for the mail server
and spamassassin. I call SA from postfix. I'm using that box as a gateway,
om: German Staltari [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 9:30 AM
To: JC; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] lock failed: little help
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 08:37:57 -0500, JC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Few more questions: What version of SA are
What do you mean you started spamd AND spamassassin? What commands did you
run?
-Original Message-
From: Mail Monitor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 9:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] How do I confirm functioning of SA
Hi,
I have installed SA
Actually, I realise now that my answer was to your subject line, and not to
your actual question. lol sorry bout that! ;)
-Original Message-
From: JC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 11:18 AM
To: 'Mail Monitor'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk
Check your incoming mail headers for "X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.XX" or X-spam-status.
-Original Message-
From: Mail Monitor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 9:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] How do I confirm functioning of SA
Hi,
Few more questions: What version of SA are you using? What platform are you
running? Have you done a recent upgrade? If so, what version did you upgrade
from?
-Original Message-
From: German Staltari [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 14:07:50 -0500, JC <[EMAIL PROTEC
What makes you say that? Could you post whatever details lead you to that
conclusion?
-Original Message-
From: German Staltari [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 10:36:55 -0500, JC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, I think I remembered! I think what I did was
Actually, I think I remembered! I think what I did was to run sa-learn
--rebuild *on the correct db directory* I'm pretty sure it has to be a
directory. Anyways, let me know if that works out for you!
=-) Good luck!
-J.C.
-Original Message-
From: German Staltari [mailto:[EMAIL PR
I was getting this error a while back. I'm sorry that I can't remember what
exactly I did to fix it, could you provide a little more detail? Hopefully
ittl jog my memory.
-Original Message-
From: German Staltari [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 9:31 AM
To: [EMAIL
Do you have spamassassin running as root? If not, log on as the user that
spamassassin runs as, and try the test again.
Original Message-
From: Fritz Mesedilla [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes I have dB_file installed (version 1.806).
My amavisd-new is running under amavis.
my $MYHOME var i
Here is my local.cf:
required_hits 5
rewrite_subject 1
subject_tag [SPAM]
skip_rbl_checks 1
bayes_auto_learn 0
use_dcc 0
use_pyzor 0
check_mx_attempts 0
use_razor2 0
I'm pretty sure I've turned all network tests off with that, but I am seeing
scan times around 30-50, very erratic times, too. Somet
I've been getting messages from aol lately that are triggering this rule. My
DNS is not broken, and it's not hitting on any of the other "major ISPs".
Does anybody know if aol has changed something lately, or maybe know a
workaround? I looked in 20_head_tests.cf, and for the actual rule, it says
ev
Spamassassin seems to be running fine, except when I go into debug mode, I
get an error. Here is some relevant output:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /]$ spamd -c -a -m5 -H -D
debug: Score set 0 chosen.
debug: Running in taint mode, removing unsafe env vars, and resetting PATH
debug: PATH included '/usr/local/
14 matches
Mail list logo
