On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 16:26, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 09:40:00AM +0000, Ian MacDougall wrote:
> > We have a similar structure, but for reasons I won't go into we have SA
> > behind our primary mailservers.
>
> Actually, would you mind going i
ves, but we wanted to do that so that we could
scrub the most objectionable spam from our users email.
I can provide further details if you are interested.
--
Ian MacDougall
***
CONFIDENTIALITY. This e-mail and any attachments are
t; SpamAssassin (slow) would deal with wire-speed routing (fast ;)
Oh dear, sorry for getting your hopes up. I'll still write it up as
there appears to be some interest :)
--
Ian MacDougall
**
CONFIDENTIALITY.This e-ma
>
> I think he means this juniper: http://www.obtuse.com/juniper/ :-)
Yes that is correct.
--
Ian MacDougall
**
CONFIDENTIALITY.This e-mail and any attachments are
confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 18:35, Bob Amen wrote:
> Ian MacDougall wrote:
> > Well the idea came from the Linux Journal article a while back.
>
>
> Which issue was that?
Issue 92 see: http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=4882
> My problem with Perl as a m
only ran two or three email addresses through the spamassassin
part, all of the email run through the smtpd/smtpfwdd.
--
Ian MacDougall
**
CONFIDENTIALITY.This e-mail and any attachments are
confidential and may also be pri
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 19:31, Bob Amen wrote:
> Ian MacDougall wrote:
>
> > Hello, (sorry for the disclaimer)
> >
> > I've put together a system using the Juniper smtpd+smtpfwdd daemons and
> > spamd, with a bit of perl glue in between.
> > Would th
agging the headers on
the rest. This means that those people who get a lot of spam can setup a
filter on their mail client and those that don't, don't see anything
unless they look at the headers.
Would this system be worth documenting and making available to anyone?
:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=7.0
tests=NO_REAL_NAME,MSG_ID_ADDED_BY_MTA_3 version=2.31
I always get a 1.6 from my webmail account.
--
Ian MacDougall
***
CONFIDENTIALITY. This e-mail and any attachments are
confidentia