Re: [SAtalk] success stories with SA ?

2003-01-16 Thread Ian MacDougall
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 16:26, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 09:40:00AM +0000, Ian MacDougall wrote: > > We have a similar structure, but for reasons I won't go into we have SA > > behind our primary mailservers. > > Actually, would you mind going i

Re: [SAtalk] success stories with SA ?

2003-01-16 Thread Ian MacDougall
ves, but we wanted to do that so that we could scrub the most objectionable spam from our users email. I can provide further details if you are interested. -- Ian MacDougall *** CONFIDENTIALITY. This e-mail and any attachments are

Re: [SAtalk] smtpd+spamd

2002-11-27 Thread Ian MacDougall
t; SpamAssassin (slow) would deal with wire-speed routing (fast ;) Oh dear, sorry for getting your hopes up. I'll still write it up as there appears to be some interest :) -- Ian MacDougall ** CONFIDENTIALITY.This e-ma

RE: [SAtalk] smtpd+spamd

2002-11-27 Thread Ian MacDougall
> > I think he means this juniper: http://www.obtuse.com/juniper/ :-) Yes that is correct. -- Ian MacDougall ** CONFIDENTIALITY.This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not

Re: [SAtalk] smtpd+spamd

2002-11-27 Thread Ian MacDougall
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 18:35, Bob Amen wrote: > Ian MacDougall wrote: > > Well the idea came from the Linux Journal article a while back. > > > Which issue was that? Issue 92 see: http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=4882 > My problem with Perl as a m

RE: [SAtalk] smtpd+spamd

2002-11-26 Thread Ian MacDougall
only ran two or three email addresses through the spamassassin part, all of the email run through the smtpd/smtpfwdd. -- Ian MacDougall ** CONFIDENTIALITY.This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may also be pri

Re: [SAtalk] smtpd+spamd

2002-11-26 Thread Ian MacDougall
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 19:31, Bob Amen wrote: > Ian MacDougall wrote: > > > Hello, (sorry for the disclaimer) > > > > I've put together a system using the Juniper smtpd+smtpfwdd daemons and > > spamd, with a bit of perl glue in between. > > Would th

[SAtalk] smtpd+spamd

2002-11-25 Thread Ian MacDougall
agging the headers on the rest. This means that those people who get a lot of spam can setup a filter on their mail client and those that don't, don't see anything unless they look at the headers. Would this system be worth documenting and making available to anyone?

Re: [SAtalk] Really bad false positive

2002-11-14 Thread Ian MacDougall
: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=7.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME,MSG_ID_ADDED_BY_MTA_3 version=2.31 I always get a 1.6 from my webmail account. -- Ian MacDougall *** CONFIDENTIALITY. This e-mail and any attachments are confidentia