Jeremy Turner wrote:
On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 18:32, SpamTalk wrote:
I think Exim might also have the capability.
I believe it does have this capability. I've been meaning to test it
out.
What I would like to see is the ability of the gateway to use LDAP to
validate the recipient exists
Roman Katzer wrote:
Hi Stephane,
On Tuesday, January 14, 2003, 19:13:26, you wrote:
I would be interested in knowing if there is a similar large company (>
5000 mailboxes) having successfully implemented spamassassin in order to
share the experience -- we had a successful pilot running and wo
Somik Raha wrote:
Hi,
I went thru some of the earlier messages titled "Increase in low scoring
spam", but I wasn't able to figure out what I could do in version 2.43 to
block mails from High Speed Media (I'm still new to SA).
Hamish Marson had posted these checks :
Mike Burger wrote:
Definitely not postfix.
Postfix's entries would look like:
domain.com 550 Blocked due to spamming
Actually they are from postfix. But thanks anyway.
They are header checks using a regexp table.
H
On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got my threshold set to 5, and stuff still slips through. It's
usually *very* short spam, with cleverly spelled words like "p0rn" instead
of "porn" and stuff like that. It's annoying, but spams like that have
been few & far between.
My threshold is at 3, other
Mark Martinec wrote:
Tom,
| > Turning on SA auto whitelists is presently not useful
| > with amavisd-new. There is a fundamental problem in that
| > SpamAssassin is geared to work fine with one-recipient-
| > -at-a-time messages, and amavisd-new tries to process
| > multi-recipient messages in o
Tom Allison wrote:
Mark Martinec wrote:
Tom,
| I'm trying to get SA 2.50 working under the amavisd-new release.
| It's working, I think. At least according to the logs.
| Between the two, there is a marked increase in performance.
| Very nice!
| But there is no WhiteList.
| Any suggestions o
Federico Voges wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I've been doing some tests using SA 2.41 without much troubles. Today I
decided to upgrade to the latest stable version (2.43).
After installing the new version, spamd didn't work anymore.
spamassassin works ok.
After try
Is it possible to use the auto whitelisting from a program (Such as
amavisd-new 20020630) that doesn't call spamassassin from the command
line? The only docs I can really find on auto whitelisting say to use
it, call spamassassin with the -a option... Yet nothing for when called
directly using
I have a probloem with SA 2.43. I'm adding in checks to local.cf to pick
up the spammers at Daily Promotions, but although SA works fine in test
mode picking up the match AND the score, when it's called from
amavisd-new 20020630, then SA picks up the match OK, but NOT the
score... (And so amavi
10 matches
Mail list logo
