Hi Jennifer,
When running lint on the latest chickenpox (1.11) I get this error:
donkeykong:/etc/mail/spamassassin/RulesDuJour # /usr/local/bin/spamassassin
--lint
Failed to compile body SpamAssassin tests, skipping:
(Unmatched ( in regex; marked by <-- HERE in
is
>> Thielen
>> Sent: 22 January 2004 07:36
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: [SAtalk] Rules Du Jour v 1.07b
>>
>>
>> Here is a consolidated reply to a bunch of Rules Du Jour messages:
>> btw, version
Hi Chris,
Small change for RulesDuJour: when sa is not in path lint will not succeed
(line 313). Maybe you could add a variable that contains the path to sa in
the settings?
Erik
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere
Hi all,
I get the following errors from spamd (tons of them in my logfiles) and I
have no idea how to fix this. Ditching my bayes_* files isn't an option as
it takes several hours to regenerate them (I have a spam corpus of about
2 which I collected over a period of 10 months...). Sa-learn --r
Hi all,
I get the following errors from spamd (tons of them in my logfiles) and I
have no idea how to fix this. Ditching my bayes_* files isn't a good option
as it takes several hours to regenerate them (I have a spam corpus of about
2 which I collected over a period of 7 months...). Sa-learn
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens
> MIKE YRABEDRA
> Verzonden: maandag 17 november 2003 17:37
> Aan: SPAMASSASSIN
> Onderwerp: Re: [SAtalk] Upgrade or Stay?
>
>
> on 11/17/03 10:13 AM, Todd Schuldt at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > S
> > You need to pass the logfile name of your mail-daemon, e.g.
> > ./spamstats0.4b5.pl /var/log/mail
> > I use spamd, and it works.
>
> > Markus
>
> you have an link for this script? Thank you.
>
First hit after googling for spamstats and perl:
http://freshmeat.net/projects/spamstats/?topic_id=
> It may be because it is a legitimatly constructed email, and not one
> sent from a mass mailer program or anything like that.
>
Or maybe the email message is legitimate and you were the only recipient...
and she really needs your help! ;-)
> On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 23:19, Simon Byrnand wrote:
>
Hi,
Anybody know what this error means?
__db_assert: "0" failed: file "../dist/../common/db_err.c", line 200
/home/erik/.spamassassin/sa-learn-cron: line 24: 20282 Aborted
It showed up when running a cron script that calls sa-learn.
Thx,
Erik
---
Thx, indeed the code runs fine as far as I can tell for now.
> Erik Slooff writes:
> >> If you fancy testing a pre-release of SpamAssassin 2.60, one is now
> >> available:
> >>
> >
> >I currently have a running SA 2.60-cvs setup (from 220603)
> wi
> If you fancy testing a pre-release of SpamAssassin 2.60, one is now
> available:
>
I currently have a running SA 2.60-cvs setup (from 220603) with which I
had no probs running "make test". However, with SA 2.60-PR1 I have the
following errors running "make test":
t/spamd_report_ifspam...ok
> I received an email with the attached header and 2.55 scored a 0.0,
absolutely no
> tests were triggered. 2.43 on the other hand scored it as a 1.8. I
was kinda
> surprised that it didn't trigger anything in 2.55. Can somebody else
run it through
> and tell me what you got. Maybe there is some
Hi Jim,
For example when issuing the following command from the SA source dir
(where the sample spam message is):
# spamassassin -D < sample-spam.txt > out.tx
I get (among a lot of other output) the following lines indicating
Net::DNS is working
debug: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? yes
debug
Being the "joker" that was the cause of this thread I can only support
the response of others that such a reaction to a posting in *this* list
amazes me a bit. Just wanted to share as much info as necessary and that
obviously will sometimes create false negatives My mail was not
meant to offend
14 matches
Mail list logo
