On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 10:06:58AM -0800, Christopher Eykamp wrote:
> I am wondering why the following message was autolearned. The message
> scored heavily negative, yet it was learned as spam (which, in fact, it
> was, but an error in my whitelist let it slip through). I would not expect
> a
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 10:08:32PM -0600, Alan Lehman wrote:
> For the occasional false positives, I would like to have an automated
> method to "clean" the SA tags. My thought was to create a mailbox
> with a procmail recipe to clean the email and return it to the sender.
> It might look
> somet
On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 06:54:36PM -0400, Joseph Barillari wrote:
>
> Would spamc/spamd respond better to an inrush of mail? Or is there a
> switch to flip to make procmail or sendmail process the mail serially
> -- not by re-queuing it, but by using some form of locking such that
> when one spam
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 01:49:23PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 10:26:16AM -0700, David Rees wrote:
> > It seems that recent (>=2.30) versions of SpamAssassin require perl 5.6 or
> > higher.
>
> ??? It's running fine for me on Perl 5
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 12:05:26PM -0500, tang wrote:
> Just installed SpamAssassin on our Sun's Ultra10 running Solaris 7,
> but it doesn't work:
>
> tang@bionmr3:~/bin/SpamAssassin 124>./spamassassin < sample-nonspam.txt
> Can't locate Time/HiRes.pm in @INC (@INC contains: ../lib lib
> /usr/loc
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 10:26:55AM -0700, Jeff Campbell wrote:
> On Thursday, June 20, 2002, at 11:46 AM, Jeff Campbell wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, June 20, 2002, at 11:32 AM, Carsten Erickson wrote:
> >
> >> I installed 2.3 yesterday, and it seems to be working ok, however I
> >> notice a
> >> fe
