Spammers stick to what they know generally...screwing people, not protecting
them.
- Original Message -
From: "Tony Earnshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 8:06 AM
Subject: [SAtalk] I'm fed up with Viagra spam ...
> ... time for new spam type
Technically speaking you could go after the spammer/spamvertized site for
identity theft and defamation of character. In fact I wouldn't hesitate, you
have nothing to loose.
- Original Message -
From: "Abigail Marshall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 23, 20
That was probably added after they started
receiving complaints from recipients of this scam.
- Original Message -
From:
Chris Santerre
To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 11:36
AM
Subject: [SAtalk] OK, this Nigerian takes
the cake, hands d
Based on what? From what I have heard SCO has no valid complaint as Novell
was the true license holder (and still is).
- Original Message -
From: "Peter P. Benac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Chris Barnes'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'SpamAssassin'"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003
Because the economics of spam dictate a solution on the network level. If
the mail makes it through to your PC, then the damage is done, it has
already consumed bandwidth, space, and time. You may feel marginally
inconvenienced, but the fact of the matter is, spam can cost an ISP or a
buisnesses te
Greetings,
I've been trying to configure
Exim 4.1x to call SA via it's config file, and have tried the posted
configurations with no success. Exim passes mail fine, however it never gets
processed by SA during the proceedure. The following is my exim config file for
that machine...any id
