Quoting Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg28318.html
That's a great post...we should add it to the wiki, if you're so inclined.
I'd be happy to do it, but I didn't just want to plug it in there w/o asking
the author first.
Regards;
DaC
--
Quoting Michael Satterwhite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I know what habeas is *SUPPOSED* to do, but right now it really isn't
> working.
and
>
> Personally, I've set its scoring to zero, but I do understand those that
> are
> giving it a positive score. You'd have to agree that a message with the
Quoting Chris Santerre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Anywho, like the subject says, these 2 files are updated. The Tripwire
> file
> is almost half the size it was before!
Sorry if this is a FAQ; couldn't see a definitive answer in the archives. I
have a very small list of domains that I get tons of spa
Quoting Bob Proulx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> And many other people, not just these two, had the same sentiments.
> Which really saddens me.
>
> For years I have heard people say we need to do something about spam.
> That filtering is only treating the symptom and not the disease. That
> we need to
Quoting Raquel Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Why not use procmail to remove anything with that header?
That's so crazy, it just might work...
DaC
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configur
Quoting Bart Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> It's usually easier to promptly re-learn a false negative as spam than
> it
> is to re-learn a false positive as ham, because FNs probably go right
> into
> your mailbox while FPs are dropped in a quarantine (or worse). Unless
> you're not paying atten
Hi:
A lot of mail has shown up in the group debating the soundness of Habeas's
watermarking scheme. Whether that debate is on topic, I'll leave as an
exercise for others. For the record, I think Habeas's idea is sound enough,
provided they follow through with it. But this is not what concerns me.
Quoting Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> If you learn a message that has already been learned as the opposite
> type,
> SA will auto-forget it before learning the way you specify. :)
I understand this, always have. This is what I usually do. I only did this
is because I wanted to learn over
Quoting Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> you can just learn it as spam, it'll auto-forget.
Thanks for the reply, Theo. Normally, I would have done this, but I wanted
to remove the habeas marks before learning it as spam. Since this would make
the message differ from the original, I figured
Sigh.
This is the first time I've seen a spam come in with a phony Habeas mark
(link to spam below). Perhaps I've just been lucky up to this point...anyone
else seen this? Of course, I reported it immediately to Habeas. Let's see
what they do.
An unfortunate side effect of how SA scores mail with
Jody said:
> I'm trying to run:
> sa-learn -p /etc/MailScanner/spam.assassin.prefs.conf --spam --dir
> /var/spool/mail/cleveland
>
> And, it's been going for over 2 hours now.
Something similar happened to me when using sa-learn. The problem was i was
running sa-learn over an mbox-format file a
Hi John:
> This is my embarrassingly simple first post to this list, but I can't find
> the answer. Be gentle with me - answer this and then I'll quietly leave the
> list.
>
Some of us other newbies like the embarrassingly simple questions, otherwise
we'd have nothing to respond to! Also, rath
Hi everybody:
I *think* I want to whitelist an address, but stop SA from autolearning the
whitelisted mail as ham.
Before I get started explaing why, i realize this topic has been discussed
here. This thread is enlightening:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general/29088
He
13 matches
Mail list logo
