I use a homemade filter chain based on the Perl Mail::Audit package.
The advantage is, if you know Perl, it's much easier to set up and maintain
than Procmail.
The disadvantage is, if you don't know Perl you probably can't use it. Oh
yeah, and running it means you have to deal with whatever overh
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 02:57:14PM -0400, Scott Lambert wrote:
> Spamd running with -m parameter?
Um, I have no idea. I can check.
>
> If spamc can't connect to spamd, (all slots full on the spamd server),
> it just passes the message through. If spamd dies while running under
> something like D
Oh good, maybe I'm not alone in this. :)
I didn't check the sizes on the mails that slipped through, although some of
them were just knockoffs I sent myself with a short body like "foo bar baz".
Bob Apthorpe suggested that mails over a large limit (100K maybe) get
dropped. That's not the problem
but as far as I can tell Gentoo is picking up
Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60.tar.gz, which may be the problem right there.
-- Creede
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 09:10:33PM -0700, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> Creede Lambard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hello all, new to the list,
Hello all, new to the list, so apologies if this has already been covered.
I upgraded my version of SpamAssassin from 2.55 to 2.6 this morning, turned
it on, and started watching the mail log when obvious spams started appearing
in my mailbox. At first I thought it was only spam that was being for
