Brian Godette wrote:
> Maybe they'll start writting in Middle English to target that
> untapped market of english lit majors/grads.
Or Elvish for the larger market of Tokien die-hards!
Are the spammers using some sort of filter to obscure the text
into something consistently decipherable? The mes
On Fri, 2004-01-16 at 11:52, Evan Platt wrote:
> "unsubscribed"?
>
> No, you're not (yet).
>
> What is it? In the past week, the ratio of 'unsubscribe' messages to normal
> traffic has been like 1:1.
Hmm... When last I examined mailing list managers, there were some that
were excellent at handli
I've seen mention made of the fact that spammers frequent these lists,
and many of the websites referenced as anti-spam resources. Are there
any organized efforts to monitor sites and lists the spammers themselves
frequent to try to anticipate the directions things may head in the near
future to ai
John Beamon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...] (I particularly like seeing the "* 0.5 -- BODY: Possible porn - Hot,
> Nasty, Wild, Young" rating on a children's autism mailing list...)
Having read through the web page (apparently the email was the SAME HTML
page -- argh!), I do wonder what flagged
Evan Platt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> I thought he replied with..
>
>> I did not know spamassassin is home-brew. [...]
I think that was a quote from a personal email to Chris, to which he then Cc:'d
the list in response.
I got almost the exact same reply from a direct email I sent Lenny
On Fri, 2003-12-26 at 02:00, schafer wrote:
> [...]
> Exhibit:
>
> Start SpamAssassin results
> 7.10 points, 5.5 required;
> [...]
> * 3.0 -- BODY: Bayesian classifier says spam probability is 99 to 100%
> [score: 0.9988]
> [...]
> * -4.3 -- AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment
> End of SpamAs
